Experts said the Diaoyu Islands dispute escalated with the US-Japan strategic objectives consistent with
the 7, Chinese fishing political 202,204,35001 vessel formation in the process of the implementation of China’s exclusive economic zone fishing protection patrol in the waters near the Diaoyu Islands has suffered from the interference of the Japan Coast Guard patrol. The Luo win glory photo Source: Xinhua
Chen Hu Soldiers: Japanese record speech the farce intentions of purchase Island
Xinhua Zhuangao: most recently, played out in Japan scene by scene, the so-called purchase of the farce of the Diaoyu Islands. First, a very right-wingers in Japan Ishihara proposed purchase of the Diaoyu Islands in the name of Tokyo Prefecture. Then, Noda, Japanese Prime Minister, to the name of the country’s purchase of the Diaoyu Islands. In fact, whether by Tokyo Prefecture in the name of or on behalf of the Japanese national to buy the Diaoyu Islands, are related to and around the Diaoyu Islands dispute a core issue – the sovereignty of the Diaoyu Islands issue.
not own things, could not be disposed of. If Japan is to achieve the so-called “Share Island” process is equivalent to the foreign declare the sovereignty of the Diaoyu Islands. Then such an action, apparently approaching a bottom line of China to deal with the problem of the Diaoyu Islands, the Diaoyu Islands dispute rapid warming, but also caused great concern of the Chinese domestic.
around the Diaoyu Islands dispute, Japan’s recent moves can not help but let people have this question: Japan on the Diaoyu Islands, what to do? Deeper thinking about this problem, it seems there is hidden behind a number of reasons outside the Sino-Japanese. There is also a concern to everyone, how to look at the Diaoyu Islands dispute.
Japan to provoke the Diaoyu Islands dispute, or that the Diaoyu Islands dispute rapid warming, the Japanese what to do? Diaoyu Islands, Japan, just a few deserted desert island. Many commentators have talked about the Diaoyu Islands, Japan, in fact, contain a major economic and military significance. From the economic point of view, to obtain the Diaoyu Islands, not only is this series of islands, but also to the East China Sea demarcation. In other words, if the Japanese side to obtain the sovereignty of the Diaoyu Islands, it which can and Japan on East China Sea demarcation, access to hundreds of thousands of square kilometers of maritime territory, or maritime exclusive economic zone. Similarly, if this happens, China will lose hundreds of thousands of square kilometers of maritime exclusive economic zone.
from the Japanese point of view, the Diaoyu Islands, there are also a potentially significant military significance. In Japan, for a long time there is a discussion of “A thousand nautical miles lifeline. Of the Japanese side, Japan is an island of its commodity exports, imports of energy and raw materials, dependent on the sea lines of communication south of Japan. This transit, according to the Japanese, it is to be extended to 1,000 nautical miles. Japan’s strategy scholars, this known as the “10 million nautical miles lifeline. Diaoyu Islands in the middle part of the so-called lifeline. From this perspective, Japan to compete for the sovereignty of the Diaoyu Islands, including the huge economic importance and military significance.
Japan compete for the sovereignty of the Diaoyu Islands, just some of the economic significance and potential military significance? I’m afraid things are not so simple, economic importance and military significance is obvious, the deeper meaning is often hide in the fog. This can not but referred to the long-term strategic objectives. Japan’s long-term strategic goal is to make Japan the so-called “normal big country. In other words, to obtain its own diplomatic, economic, political, military, and full autonomy. In this process, facing a breakthrough in a series of so-called “limit”. The reason of this “limit”, and historical factors. Specifically, one is the constraints of Japan’s “peace constitution”, belonging to the constraints of domestic and international constraints. The warming of the Diaoyu Islands dispute and these two factors are closely related.
From the domestic factors, Japan wants to push the limits and constraints to obtain the domestic public opinion, there must be a high-sounding excuse. The contradictions of the Diaoyu Islands, once it started, the formation of a so-called “defense of the sovereignty” of public opinion in Japan. In order to defend the sovereignty, the development of military power, and change the past, restrictions on the use of military force, it becomes a natural thing.
from international factors, the core of the problem constraints are the constraints of the United States. Factors of the United States, is precisely the difficulty of the Diaoyu Islands dispute behind the scenes is an important factor to be noticed. From a historical perspective we look back at the origins of the dispute over the Diaoyu Islands, you will find the United States played an important role here.
Diaoyu Islands dispute appears, and the United States has an important relationship. The end of World War II, the Diaoyu Islands is under the control of those in the U.S., after the United States control over the transferred to the Japan. But the United States and not in the handover process made it clear that sovereignty to Japan. From this place, we can be seen, the United States had to do this series of moves, in fact on the strategic chessboard, the default of a trap. Today, when necessary, the design of this early beginning to play a role. From the past colonial era, these traditional powers in dealing with such strategic issues, there are often some of the design of far-reaching impact on future generations. Today, we see hotspots, has this early powers of colonial policy factors. Including chaos in the Middle East, South Asia, India and Pakistan dispute, you could say is a trap of the early Western powers in the colonial era coming to an end when, down by default, the Diaoyu Islands as well.
today, the Americans when it return to the Asia-Pacific such a concept, originally placed in a busy child took up on the strategic chessboard. For the U.S., to return to the Asia-Pacific, verbally say that such a concept, but actually doing it is not so simple. After two wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, American power consumption, state of the economy is not very satisfactory. Now we see the so-called return to the Asia-Pacific region, more prominent military forces to return to the Asia-Pacific. Even from a military power, the United States invested in reality, but a few warships, thousands of troops. In fact, this investment in military power, but also up to less than the year the Korean War and Vietnam War era U.S. military force levels in the Asia-Pacific. Therefore, the United States today to achieve the strategic concept of the so-called return to the Asia-Pacific must use another means of its traditional modus operandi – “partisan gang war”, while Japan is an important goal.
how Japan is tied to the chariot of the United States, Americans have a good design. Since Japan is to achieve long-term strategic goals, to break away from the international community, especially the United States of constraints and obstacles that the United States to guide Japan. Long as the Japanese form of confrontation and conflict situation between China and Japan to increase the military strength and some other moves when the United States often take acquiescence and even support the state. Like today, the United States once again to the Diaoyu Islands program to assist in the defense of Japan and the United States within the context of
while the Japanese figured out the psychology of the United States, as long as the Sino-Japanese escalation of conflict, it is possible to take a step to the long-term goal. This step by step forward accumulated, can be closer and closer to their own strategic objectives. To reach the purpose of which Japan over the Diaoyu Islands dispute, not just the reality of the island’s sovereignty, economic interests and potential military significance, there is a larger goal through this dispute, made important progress towards the long-term national strategic objectives. A series of moves made by the United States, in fact, and strategic design, exactly the same. Therefore, the upgrade of the Diaoyu Islands dispute, and the goal of Japan and the United States designed the same.
since to figure out, upgrade the appearance of the Diaoyu Islands dispute and internal factors relating to the following, that is, how does China view the dispute over the Diaoyu Islands.
a lot of people are speaking, the Diaoyu involve substantial economic interests, but also there is a significant potential military significance. In which the dispute over the Diaoyu Islands, China must stick to their position. In fact, for this problem, there is another kind of understanding.
the Diaoyu Islands issue, the core of national sovereignty, regardless of the Diaoyu Islands is whether there are significant economic benefits, the existence of potential military significance, as long as it comes to the issue of national sovereignty component far in the economic interests and on top of military significance. Talked about the Diaoyu Islands dispute, for China, the more the core of things, is a matter of sovereignty. The question of sovereignty should not be considered the core national interests should not be abandoned. For a long time, we have always stressed the peaceful settlement of the Diaoyu Islands dispute by means of diplomacy, negotiation, but in this case, we have this idea of ??whether the utility?
In fact, the means of diplomatic negotiations to resolve disputes, is built on the premise of a consensus of both sides. Only in Japan, such a vision, have a consensus, both sides to maintain and will not appear paradoxical situation in the region, be possible to resolve disputes by peaceful means. In other words, both common restraint, common understanding is a prerequisite for the peaceful settlement of disputes. Any party if to break this consensus, the use of unilateral action, then the premise of using diplomacy, negotiations, peaceful settlement of disputes, will be destroyed.
Therefore, since Japan’s unilateral breaking down this consensus, and prior to this relatively peaceful situation, the Chinese side, obviously can not simply use this diplomatic negotiations by peaceful means to solve this kinds of disputes. Involved in the issue of sovereignty to the country’s core interests, any country, when others against your sovereign interests, are bound to react accordingly, international consensus.
in around the Diaoyu Islands dispute, there will be what kind of results will be what kind of way to ultimately resolve contradictions, settling disputes, it is necessary to look at Japan’s exactly this unilateral way, but also go far.
welcome comments I want to comment
Japanese media: Japanese high-ranking officials that the inherent territory of the Diaoyu Islands, non day
Japan to protest the Chinese fishery administration vessel to the Diaoyu Islands, said the incident is very serious
People’s Daily: the risk of the Diaoyu Islands issue out of control is not absolute does not exist
of fishery boats on the Diaoyu Islands boarding and inspection of fishing vessels has been the interference of Japan
Japanese expert: China is likely to take action board Diaoyu Islands
(edit: SN049) share: