Experts said Feiti have three Huangyan Island in accordance with the case of self-deception
CCTV “global vision” broadcast on May 9, 2012 “Philippines insisted upgrade situation what sorts? “The following are programs Record:
Moderator labor Chunyan:
Good evening, welcome to watch live news channel is” global vision “, I labor Chunyan.
Huangyan Island event has been a month, although the Chinese side put forward several solemn representations repeatedly reiterate that Huangyan Island is China’s inherent territory, but the Philippines is indeed bent, continue to expand the state of affairs. The Philippines has repeatedly escalate out what to consider in the studio today invited the the Commentator Lawsuits President, the International Institute for Strategic Studies, Professor paternal great-great-grandfather expensive Mr. Let’s participate in the discussion.
us first to connect the front of the reporters asked about the latest situation immediately to connect is the Philippine capital of Manila, this station reporter Wang Lulu, Lulu Hello.
Wang Lulu Manila:
First I ask the question is, we know that on the 7th day, the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs Ministers met with the charge d’affaires of the Philippine Embassy in on Huangyan Island incident to the Philippine side has made solemn representations, the Philippines official what kind of response?
good for China’s statement, the Philippine side really gave a brief response. Hernandez, a spokesman for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Philippines, said the Philippine side some effort now underway to ease the tensions of the Huangyan Island, Hernandez now want to propose a new diplomatic initiative can help to ease the Huangyan tensions of the island, as this initiative is how the Philippines will to carry out what kind of action, Hernandez refused to give more details.
afternoon, we have just received from the Department of State a new statement, this statement is reiterated that the United States and the Philippines in 1951 to develop the treaty, this treaty is called the “US-Philippine Mutual Defense Treaty Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Philippines in this statement, in order to prevent some of the misconceptions of the outside world may want to reiterate some of the provisions of the treaty, for the record. I have also read that they would like to reiterate these terms, which I found so few, he mentioned, “according to the treaty, the United States and the two countries openly declared that solidarity, common defense against external armed attack.”
addition to this, he also specifically mentioned in the last year, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton visit to the Philippines, accepted a reporter’s interview, the interview asked Hillary, “China and the Philippines conflict The United States will do. “when Hillary answered, she said the United States will abide by the” Mutual Defense Treaty “to fulfill its commitments, so today the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Philippines in a statement, with particular emphasis on Hillary Clinton said at the time this sentence. At the end of the statement of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs also mentioned a couple of days ago, US-Philippines held in Washington on the 2 +2 meeting, in this statement, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Philippines said, “2 +2 meeting” the United States the two sides reached new cooperation mechanism, the host.
there is a problem we are very concerned, because we know that May 11, acquired the Philippines wants to be a known as the largest in the history anti-China rally. In this regard, the Philippine media have reported, the other Filipino has what kind of reaction?
Philippine media a few days ago for anti-China procession, some of the reports, because it is actually a non-governmental organizations to the initiative, the non-governmental organizations called ” Filipino expatriate organization. ” That the Philippine media this diaspora organizations were reported, but in these days and no more reports.
Now the local situation here from the Philippines as well, including Manila where I am now, everything is relatively normal work and life are not subject to any influence, for the procession to be held on the 11th, the city of Manila The government is also well prepared and they said has received diaspora organizations to send them a notification that acquired will be held in the procession, so they are good police work, the people will want to protect a security.
the same time, the Chinese Embassy in the Philippines also issued some warnings and the Philippine side to negotiate, urged the Philippine side to hope that they will comply with the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, “in the day to ensure that the Chinese Embassy in the Philippines tube community and property safety, at the same time, also on the website of the Philippine Embassy Commercial Office issued a statement, China, some Chinese-funded institutions in the Philippines personnel, pay attention to safety in the past two days, time travel can go hand in hand , do not conflict with local people, the embassy also do some work, and wants to ensure the safety of overseas Chinese in the Philippines, Chunyan.
good, very grateful to Wang Lulu reported from the Philippines, thank you. Next we look at a clip, comb the Huangyan Island events continue to simmer in the past month.
Huangyan Island event has continued for a month, this month, the Philippines has repeatedly challenge the patience bottom line, claiming that events and strive to be resolved through diplomatic channels. However, in fact never public opinion, media, high-level position, additional ship unauthorized removal of a sign of China’s Huangyan Island and a series of little tricks, and constantly heating situation.
April 8, the Philippine Navy tried to snatch jobs near Huangyan Island fishermen, April 10, China “Navy No. 75 and No. 84″ Navy fleet rushed to the Huangyan Island waters implementation of site protection for me fishing boats and fishermen. April 12, the Philippine military exercises, 德尔皮拉尔? ? Huangyan Island waters, but the Philippines Youxiang the area sent a Coast Guard vessel, trying to carry out the so-called “inspection sovereignty”? ? May 16, Philippine President Corazon Aquino III said, “In order to solve the dispute between the parties, the Philippine side with China dialogue.” However, the same day, the Philippine the reassignment Navy Ed game frigate replacement “Palawan” search and rescue ship, at the same time, the Philippines and the United States in 28 joint military exercises in the waters opposite the Huangyan Island officially opened.
capricious, the true intentions of the Philippines exposed, April 17, the Philippines said it would Huangyan Island dispute to the International Court tries to turn on the Law of the Sea internationalize the dispute. April 18, media reports of the Philippines, Philippine foreign and defense ministers will be held April 30 in Washington, U.S. Secretary of State and Secretary of Defense meeting, hinted that it might seek U.S. intervention in the dispute over Huangyan Island. April 22, the Philippine Foreign politicians and the media to incite anti-Chinese sentiments, vain attempt to magnify the situation, the uproar beating the non-people anti-China, April 22, the spirit of “the overall situation of starting, peaceful settlement of the” principle, to alleviate withdrawal from the situation two ocean surveillance ship, goodwill, then the Philippine side did not concede, the Philippine President to continue to let it continue to deploy vessels.
on April 24, such as Aquino III said, the Philippines deployed a guard vessel, the Philippine Department of State said “official Huangyan Island dispute to the International Law of the Sea Court.” April 27, the Philippines began international tenders for exploration rights in 15 fields and the Philippine Energy Minister to assure investors that the tender of 15 regions belong to the territory of the Philippines. On this day, the Philippine side to unilaterally stop a diplomatic dialogue with China over the Huangyan Island event.
April 29, President Corazon Aquino of the Philippines side said, not with the Chinese military conflict; the other side ordered the relevant departments of the Philippines to collect evidence of the so-called “China bullying Philippines”, prepared to submit to international court.
(Huangyan Island, the Philippines have the fourth week of the event)
April 30, Philippine military said that the Philippine side to six fishing boats have returned to the waters of the Huangyan Island and Philippine fishermen to continue the area engaged in fishing operations. May 2, Philippine Foreign Minister is visiting the United States, hope the U.S. can continue to dominate Asia, and the Philippines to provide more preparation, such as patrol boats, aircraft and radar systems. May 4, Philippines Huangyan Island changed its name to “Pana Tug Reef, May 6, the Philippines ordered to clear the island with the so-called Huangyan Philippines has nothing to do identification and construction.
now the Philippines on the one hand they claim to want to ease trouble, proposed new diplomatic initiatives, but on the other hand, have been continuously manufacturing a variety of little tricks and ways to you want to magnify the situation, international, want to escalate. Now start with the anti-China rally to talk about, just in front of reporters also introduced a so-called “Philippine unprecedented in the history of anti-China march” is the initiative of civil society organizations, but there is no government background?
expert opinion: Philippine domestic public opinion is questioning the President of the words and deeds
behind the background of the Government of the Philippines, is a few politicians in the promotion. Huangyan Island, the Philippines and China, it is actually the domestic public opinion is not the same, from government to media to the private sector are against the common enemy, there is no room for concessions on this issue, related to national territorial sovereignty in the Philippines, the country is not the same the attention of public opinion on this point and Aquino is not the same. And we know that the Philippines is a big country of export of labor services, nearly one hundred million people, 12 million people are working out.
so if really diaspora organizations to initiate such a big procession, in fact, it is very forceful, and this is evidenced by what is a few people in the Philippine government, including President Aquino also incite this matter launched its overseas labor, including, for example anti-China march, he also said such a thing. Which reflect, few politicians in the Philippines including the Philippine government, in fact it is a matter of fact in the hands of resources is not enough to Huangyan Island internationalization.
The Philippines has always wanted to do a thing in this event such a situation, internationalization, but it does not have diplomatic resources, he wanted to do such efforts, the ASEAN countries do not declare, like the United States the position it did not reflect this support, so it only from their own perspective to make the international move, then it is the establishment of the Philippines 1200 overseas workers, overseas workers can really mobilized from the Philippines government perspective, at least to make an international situation, but the problem is in the Philippines, domestic, not all of the strength of such a move recognized Aquino out.
these days, the media of the Philippines has actually questioned his move, Aquino now is embarrassing, he wants this issue to sizzling, the domestic media to keep up. including as anti-China demonstration in this matter, the media reported, in fact, not a particular concern, you want to ask the ordinary people of the Philippines have a lot of people do not even know this thing.
for the Philippine government, in fact, there is one thing is more embarrassing, because 2 + 2 US-Philippine defense minister, foreign minister talks before the Philippines have placed high expectations on the attitude of the United States, but later public statement “the United States in the South China Sea issue will not choose sides. But we also asked the two to be interpreted, just reporters message this afternoon, the Philippine diplomacy made a statement, the statement specifically reiterated some of the provisions of the US-Philippine Mutual Defense Treaty “, and why in this time, the Philippines, again to take the US-Philippine mutual defense clause for the thing?
emperor you the International Institute for Strategic Studies Professor:
We know that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Philippines such a position with the Philippines to meet with his agent said a word in our Ministry of Foreign Affairs Vice Minister that the Chinese side is still preferred by diplomatic and political means to solve the problem, but the Chinese side has already done all kinds of preparations. In this case, the Philippines, this statement, he cited the 1951 Philippine-US common security and defense treaties, it seems to pull the United States to back it backing.
If China between him and any armed conflict, as said in his statement, the United States will cheer for him, for his help, he might have forgotten. He is now to the United States set up a the end, he assumes that the United States really will help, in fact, we see from the interaction inside a period of time in the past, the U.S. position is very vague, the U.S. did not say in Huangyan island will follow China issued a conflict, will pay for it.
also admitted that Huangyan Island, which is a sovereign, the dispute over sovereignty of the Philippines, the dispute over sovereignty of Americans are not involved in such disputes, the US-Philippine treaty that argument, and he also forgot that delineated in the 1951 treaty which the Philippines territory, Huangyan Island is not included, according to this, the Huangyan Island now want this thing to just deliberately misinterpreted or the use of the attitude of the United States backing for his own. If this is really to do so, his gambling will bet may have lost a little better than more.
Philippines to take the US-Philippine Mutual Defense Treaty “terms is the thing, we may wish to re-interpret, according to the treaty, the United States to protect Filipino protection to what extent, or the US-Philippine Mutual Defense how much its geographical scope?
“US-Philippines Mutual Defense Treaty and its geographical scope is very clear is that the treaty signed, the Philippines native of range. Huangyan Island, regardless of the angle from which to say it does not matter, and the Philippines, it is not even in this range. Thus we see that the position of the United States that it is not to say unprincipled, why, for example, the attitude in this time the United States, relatively speaking, is a neutral position, it does not stand. In practical terms, on this issue, if you plan to position itself does not conform to his own interests.
and the provisions of which a treaty, said the scope of this in the Philippines need to be protected. Point, the Philippines to the United States who go to paste, the actual United States on the interpretation of this treaty did not include the Huangyan Island, do not include this, and even the Philippines ask the Americans do not give you an answer. Therefore, this case as it is today, very typical, the Philippines took the initiative to the United States paste up, because he has realized, according to the US-Philippine mutual defense agreement, the United States or the Philippines or its interpretation speaking, it gets less than it is a very clear commitment to such a commitment impossible.
now is for the domestic people to cheer for such considerations. We know that this issue of the Huangyan Island, the Philippines considers its territory, and he cited some support for the theory, for example, are very close, this is a very funny thing, there is no such a situation.the
comments are: the Philippine side to the so-called “basis” untenable
it comes to this, we may also wish to show, the Philippines has put forward three so-called “basis”. Huangyan Island, we can together take a look at the basis of which three.
a geographical proximity of an exclusive economic zone theory “, there is a” sovereign theory “of inheritance. Also ask two experts to analyze, just Mr. Hung has already been mentioned, the geographic proximity theory “, according to the Philippines, Huangyan Island from the territory of the Philippines, the Huangyan Island, the Philippines, this argument .
funny, ask about the Philippines own that his big brother, the United States, Alaska has never been a territory is you nearly what kind of position, , according to the kind of argument, Alaska from Canada closer, so it is not the United States, this theory does not hold water.
an addition like “exclusive economic zone”. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, it has a land determines the ocean, in this case, the Huangyan Island is Chinese territory, it can not exist in your program to an exclusive economic zones, our program to the inside, there is no such a.
is the first island to have a professional economic zone.
so for this reason it is also untenable, including that.
expert opinion: the Philippine side in accordance with purely self-deception
sovereignty inheritance theory. United States to the Philippines, If so, you can just ask the United States, Huangyan Island is you, if not the words of the United States, there is no such an inheritance, so I think the Philippines come up with a few argument, these advocates are purely self-deception, his purpose is to tell the truth, he is not for the international public opinion, international opinion is very clear on this issue, for example, treaties of all international law is written very clearly, such a theory in international the debate does not hold water, only kidding, can only lie to the people of the country.
the people on this issue in the territory is very susceptible to nationalism, especially some of the radicalism of interference. In the case of interference of emotional frenzy, he can not tell what truth, if you say I, he supported, he can only do this. The problem is that even the Philippines, politicians, statesmen, including some of the media who do not think that Huangyan Island is the Philippines, because it can not be justified.
now the Philippines is playing two cards, a public opinion card, try to get this thing to sizzling, including “a crying two downtown hanged.” , your previous program summary. Another card is called the legal license, to put this thing unilaterally submitted to the International Tribunal, in accordance with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea Convention, sentenced to the question of attribution of the Huangyan Island. We have also explained that the Philippine side of the “big three based on” is actually three crooked theory just does not hold water.
But why Huangyan Island, the Philippines trying to make the event sizzling? Later we continue to analyze. Comments:
Philippine upgrade situation for the transfer of internal contradictions?
Huangyan Island events we continue to analyze, also mentioned earlier, the Philippines Why let the Huangyan Island event continues to upgrade constantly to heat, one reason is that want to transfer the domestic contradictions. In this respect, Mr. Gao, you have what it?
initially Aquino took office, the election when he opened a slogan, so that one of the reasons voters voted for him after he took office, the anti-corruption, he wants to shrink polarization, and he wants to develop the economy, he wants to break past the so-called Philippine Development “In the past two or three decades continued to decline, an important reason is family politics.”
after taking office, he came up this three persistent problems are not resolved, but encountered great obstacles, coupled with the impact of financial crisis, and the gap between now and Southeast Asian countries were expanding, and China is also facing economic and trade relations, it is faced with this action more and more obstacles in this case, for him for President if he would like to go on, he must seek to shore up his support rate is the domestic or relevant aspect in the Philippines valued territorial disputes and China’s territorial disputes.
just in the Huangyan Island incident, this time out, he wants to maximize this problem, maximize the benefits of, he also saw the Philippines has increasingly emphasized the use of such disputes, exist to expand in Southeast Asia, he that may support, he also saw the Japanese would also like to do something, he wanted Japan to introduce, he saw the Southeast Asian countries at this time may not be complete, if not utter a sound, may not be opposed to , so he think he can take advantage of, you can use all these things to liven up these issues, attracting international crowd.
even if the actual benefit can not get, can also cause an effect, that is, the international more and more people are talking about a growing number of mechanisms to talk about this issue, for him, He believes that to win. Comments:
Philippines is in the play “desperate”?
You said that the Philippines can maximize the benefits, I also see the reviews, you see a trouble on this thing in the Huangyan Island in the Philippines, the United States aspects immediately to turn to the military exercises in the Philippines has doubled, so the Philippines, why do not you pull back, because he hoped the U.S. side to give him more aid, and even the Philippines, in fact, he was in his a desperate measure, the best that China can beat him, so he will be able to be something more to the United States, is that right?
expert opinion: sincerity does not mean bullied restraint does not mean that tie themselves
I think how to say, only some of the media in the Philippines public opinion, for example, give Aquino to find a new level. Aquino caused by this situation, his own mind a consider, his hope is that this thing fried, China and the Philippines, the relationship between the two countries is not strained, that is, he scored diplomatic, China lost points, which he most want to see. But the event of a conflict of friction, the outcome that everyone can take into account the national strength comparison of the two countries of China and the Philippines on here, including China’s determination to defend the country’s territorial sovereignty into here, we say that the Chinese side expressed its sincerity, sincerity does not mean bullied, restraint does not mean that we treat our own hands and feet tied.
related to the issue of national territorial sovereignty, we will make a difference, no doubt about it, so that the Philippine President Aquino III, there is a bottom line where he would like to lose a very tragic. Thus we see that it has such an opinion is made out of short, his behavior in order to defend national interests, but in fact such an approach can not be justified.
recent days, the Philippine domestic public opinion is very interesting, on the one hand, some media people to stand up bravely, because such an environment, which in the Philippines, we know that in such circumstances, if he could It said China’s Huangyan Island is, it is not the Philippines, which needs a lot of courage, such a person is on the rise.
expert opinion: Philippine domestic public opinion is questioning the President of the words and deeds
a, the Philippines, some media also questioned why, Aquino jump so high, why do these things. Is very clear, the transfer of domestic contradictions, just now, Mr. Gao said, his goal was not reached, including the last year, Aquino the former 阿鲁阿罗耶 of the liquidation process, in fact, reflects the domestic political struggle very complex, it can be said when he burnt the Huangyan Island thrown out, want to be able to transfer the contradictions.
one but so that others see through when, in fact, the cards in his hand has not much.
good, now standing in the Huangyan Island incident in a month’s time node, and ask two experts, this thing and then further drag on the more unfavorable?
expert opinion: Philippine basis assumes that engage in political gamble
In fact, the development of the situation until now, the Philippines, Aquino in the hands of card playing has almost the same, the effect he wanted to build my own one bottom line, I do not conflict with China. He also to the Chinese painting of a bottom line, he believes that China can not last, and his conflict, which one assumes that his own painting. He also has a hypothetical, assuming the United States really conflict, the United States will be shot to help him.
three assume that on this basis to engage in a big gamble, if such a block down, you may lose more, this is the gamble, gamble the entire final result, we see China and the Philippines is now $ 30 billion in 2011, the future economic and trade cooperation will be further increased, if there is such a chatter, the overall situation of the two countries of China and the Philippines, the Philippine economic and trade relations serious injury, damage finally its domestic economic development, people to buy single, other countries can not pay for.
a gambling, if you lose bet on the entire United States and China relations, do not forget, our defense minister also visited the United States, and
China-US defense Long will talk about a lot of consensus, the two sides later in the Asia-Pacific region, including this line, like the Western Pacific should strengthen security cooperation as soon as the U.S. secretary of defense to visit China, but China and the United States engage in joint exercises, these practical on the United States can not foot the bill for his.
In this case, the most sensible thing is quit, choose a good time down, otherwise you go gambling, he will lose very light.
program we look at Let Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei, a statement: “The Philippine side also encouraged the domestic and overseas nationals launched against China demonstrations of this behavior has led to strong reactions and concerns of the Chinese people at home and abroad and we hope that the Philippine side will not further damage the bilateral relations. “re-emphasized that China adheres to the position of the current situation does not change through diplomatic negotiation. We once again urge The Philippine side to respond seriously China’s concerns, as soon as possible back on the right path, do not play with fire. “good, wait to continue.
Huangyan Island event which continued for a month, the Philippines, as if a posture of a household, the other side of tolerance as a sign of weakness, in fact, this is precisely the great wisdom of the performance, the lack of sensible . Remind one of the Philippines, and bent to the peril, thank you for watching today’s “global vision”, good-bye.(edit: SN049) , share: