Military of China, force comment.
Military of China, force comment.

the information Figure: U.S. F-22 tear PLA air defense network high hopes. The picture shows the F-22 fighter group.

Taipei reported that, according to Asia Times Online, the outside world that China can prevent the rapid intervention of the United States after the conflict in the Western Pacific, and can make it suffered heavy losses after the intervention. But the article that China’s anti-intervention capacity will not pose any significant threats to the United States.

article, the U.S. military has the ability to destroy China’s anti-intervention. Wired magazine article on the United States in April “pancake action” exercises were analyzed. In this exercise, the F-22 and F-16 fighter first to destroy the enemy’s air defense capability; Subsequently, the B-1 bomber to enemy targets were hit. It is worth noting that the exercise was conducted in the context of long-range strike. Obviously, the exercise was aimed at China. The surface of the exercise is to verify that the B-1 bomber strike capability in the F-22 and F-16 under the cover of the regional target of anti-intervention; In fact, it is with China in the Western Pacific Tactical proof of concept.

article that the long-range strike stealth fighter can be a strong opponent, but the number of U.S. stealth fighter is a very big short board. Only a few of the 50 bombers in the U.S. Air Force B-2 stealth bomber, while China’s air defense capability is distributed in thousands of regions. In theory, the F-22 or F-35 with the removal of these air defense facilities; but less than 200 F-22 fighters, and this number is not enough, while the F-35 development work is not yet complete .

article on the Chinese anti-access capabilities of the core. Dongfeng-21D anti-ship ballistic missile known as the “aircraft carrier killer”, is the focus of the Chinese anti-access capabilities. In addition, the Beidou satellite navigation system can improve the PLA’s combat accuracy. However, a key weapons and not enough to change the strategic situation in the Western Pacific.

Stockholm International Peace Research Graduate security experts Oliver – Broughton Inari (Oliver Braeuner), believes that China’s anti-access capabilities should not be exaggerated. He said, “The United States remains the world’s first military power, its military spending still accounts for 41 percent of global military spending”; Moreover, the support of many allies in the Asia-Pacific region.

University of Nottingham, director of the China Policy Institute, Tsang, Beijing overestimated the role of the PLA anti-access capabilities. Hit or destroy aircraft carriers and other large surface ships, not enough deterrent to prevent their involvement in the conflict in the Asia-Pacific region; the United States has been the development of counter-measures for China’s anti-access capabilities.

Finally, the article quoted the comments of the U.S. security expert, said China’s anti-intervention capacity will not cause a big challenge to the United States. Associate Professor, U.S. Naval War College, James – Holmes, specified in the Chinese anti-intervention area is more dangerous; however, did not become a restricted area of ??the U.S. military. The ability of anti-intervention is indeed a challenge, not because of its ability to block U.S. military activities in certain areas, but because the United States to be involved in these areas will have to pay a higher price. Holmes recommended to select a position to set the various regions of the country responsible for the balance of these areas and to provide the required weapons. If a regional balance is broken, the United States re-intervention. – John Pike, director of Global Security, said that the U.S. military do not have to worry about the saturation crack down on opponents; because, not which country’s armed forces have this ability. (Sri Lanka)

the share: