In Fei Nanhai confrontation was actually the Chinese orchestrated!

Home » Inside military » In Fei Nanhai confrontation was actually the Chinese orchestrated!

In Fei Nanhai confrontation was actually the Chinese orchestrated!

Date:2012-04-17Author:adminCategory:Inside militaryComment:0

April 11, a Philippine warship in the Huangyan Island waters and the number of vessels ocean surveillance ship confrontation. At that time, the Philippine police are trying to snatch a few Chinese fishermen, ocean surveillance ship arrived in time to stop, the two sides was followed by a confrontation.

the

There are signs that this confrontation may be in front of the Diaoyu Islands collision, China has thrown the bait to lure the other side to catch the results.

South China Sea, the hearts of his countrymen’s pain

the South China Sea is rich in natural resources and oil and natural gas resources. Dotted with the most extensive coral reefs, about 35 billion tons of oil reserves, known as “the second Persian Gulf”. In order to occupy these resources, a large number of Vietnam, the Philippines and Malaysia and other countries invaded and occupied these reefs belong to China.

the South China Sea or East Asia leading to South Asia, the Middle East, Africa, Europe must pass through an important international waterway. China’s leading foreign routes 39, 21 through the Nansha Islands, 60 percent of the foreign trade transportation from the Nansha Islands after. If you can control these strategic maritime channel, could threaten China’s economic security. This is the world’s most powerful naval forces, Americans are most concerned about.

, July 21, 2009, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announced in the participation in the ASEAN Regional Forum, the United States to return to Southeast Asia. “Hillary Clinton to issue such a declaration is definitely not a fad, this is the U.S. government to strategic actions taken to reverse the difficult situation in the Middle East, the U.S. government to relieve the pressure in the Middle East by supporting the fight against the ASEAN countries in the South China Sea and China, while controlling the sea lanes south by China.

Beijing clearly thinking of the United States, so in the past few years, as long as the South China Sea since the dispute will be targeting the United States, forcing the U.S. position, every time the U.S. position not to intervene in the ASEAN countries in the South China Sea dispute are honest. Should be recognized that such an approach to solve the South China Sea issue is a temporary solution, such an approach, however, for Beijing to implement their own Middle East strategy to win time. In this time of confrontation between Beijing’s performance is somewhat different from the past, this should be related to changes in the global situation.

, China to the Philippine deadline: People’s Liberation Army within three months of fear of war in the South China Sea

last few years, China’s sea areas have suffered from some the erosion of the neighboring countries, although the Chinese government and people to do the utmost restraint and patience, but the leaders of some countries holding their own country people are irresponsible attitude tried to force their invasion and occupation of China’s territorial waters, which seriously hurt the Chinese people’s feelings, but also aroused the indignation of the entire Chinese people and roar.

the recent past, the Philippines and some other countries more and more arrogant, the Chinese Foreign Ministry in line with the spirit of “good neighborly, neighborly relationships and partnerships, we continue to strive to maintain friendly relations with the countries concerned. View the current international and domestic situation, Wang I support the government’s position to support the position of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, China’s statement there is no hard-line statement, but the shadow of the anger has been gradually revealed to, but in the forced restraint, it is necessary , and is also timely.

patience does not necessarily represent no conflict occurred last year, I had written an article discussing how to deal with the problems of the South China Sea harassment, which refers to “prepare for war” the concept, it now appears, the Chinese government and military are doing this preparation.

However, speaking as private individuals, have to want to speak a few words, to fight no matter large or small, is always to have a price, of course, there will be consequences, in terms of China The price may also be smooth, in order to maximize the marginal benefit, marginal losses minimized, to make some pre-thinking is still very necessary. # P # subtitle # e #

, when the war is more appropriate? This argument may be too absolute, and that the non-playing is not.

if some of the State Peace to get along with and not continue to violate China’s sovereignty, not to fight, of course better, but whether they can really wake it? I’m afraid there is difficulty, not their own and other acute, a few large countries not to be anxious, stands out are always people who want to be, of course, must be beaten stands out.

personal thought: give the national three-month observation period, during this period, the countries must wake up and make a firm to ensure no infringement upon China’s territorial waters, otherwise, the war should become a necessity .

how to do pre-war arrangements? Main effort is not a military deployment of the so-called pre-war arrangements, these issues are left to the military treatment can be, the government’s deployment focused on the diplomatic field, this time is no longer ambiguous must be directly through China with certain big powers want to blending real idea: national sovereignty subjected to aggression, China is not ready to stay the retreat, the enemy are friends of their choice is Friends of the thanked enemy China will face up to economic advance and retreat completely linked with the sovereign dignity.

China, in particular to be well prepared Western siege. In the recent period, it is necessary to properly handle certain internal contradictions, to maximize the harmonization of national ideology, do not be afraid of small wars will cripple the economy, as long as doing “six macroeconomic policy deployment” (not detailed), not collapse of the real economy situation.

hope the Government will ask the government to the people can change their brains to find ideas, short-sighted decision-making can no longer be sustained, not only the elite have the ideas and ability, the country’s wish to take root in the overwhelming majority of ordinary people of the motherland body, rather than the elite of English pride, the existence of the state and progress will always rely on the majority of Chinese people, rather than the minority on both sides. # P # subtitle # e #

how to face the outcome of the war? Some people will ask me: Can you guarantee that China will be able to win? You can ensure that other major powers do not intervene? Can you guarantee that China’s territorial waters will be able to recover and solid?

I can only say: the war no one can guarantee 100% victory, no matter who is involved in, you have to fight your fear of intervention is not playing, keep tomorrow, they will still be involved, it is not deposit to maintain the sovereignty of the claim, simply to the United States manage to forget, how could it? Who dares to do so? As long as there is a firm confidence and courage, how much the price they have to win, not to win you have to lose sovereignty, no way to explain to future generations, can not explain to the world the past, then backward, or not to fight a dozen wins Today Is not a afraid of?

For countries not to fight in China the opportunity to do? This is good to do, not chosen to militant, not to fight better, of course, if they really respect our sovereignty, and for a negotiated settlement of disputes, of course, is the best choice, but if they guerrilla tactics to take “back” when disturbed, it still must be in accordance with the established arrangements to do to catch the opportunity to hit any reaction time to the international community.

each other choose to avoid the process of China’s most should do two things:

the

First on the entire rights and interests of Chinese territorial waters legislative re-delineation of good principles in legislation and red line, no matter who is in power, playing and not playing by the national law, are not personal hate decided, the issue of sovereignty does not have a strong legal constraints, it is difficult to achieve rigid protection; # p # subtitle # e #

The second is the conversion from the fishery sector to Department of Defense should take the initiative to maintain the main body of the maritime rights and interests the fundamental purpose of national defense force is to safeguard the sovereignty, in line with international practice, all countries are so dry, the Chinese have to convert ideas, do not afraid of the “China threat” theory, you do not, they think you’re a threat, you have done, may have actually threatened.

China’s territorial waters dilemma is the question of history, it is difficult to read all the documents a person in a particular year, a matter of responsibility, as a confidence toward the most populous country in the future, do not have to debate the past and is not, we should bravely face the future with their own efforts to solve the future problems is the real patriotic and shirk and cowardice are live responsibility of choice.

support the rational position of the Chinese Government will never deliberately pursue the war, to avoid war is to avoid the war, when someone put war imposes the head of the Chinese people, I think the best way – to fight win this war!

3 the page: , 2 , 3 , Last , Click here to comment (a total of 168 the ) ( the Article)