Eastern affairs: the United States to South Korea to do one thing at war, the Chinese intervention force
Eastern affairs: the United States to South Korea to do one thing at war, the Chinese forced to intervene
Eastern affairs: the United States to South Korea at war to do a things, to force China to intervene
Mullen: U.S. Defense Secretary to visit China next month
[Beijing News] According to the British Reuters reported Dec. 9, a short stay in Japan the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff Mike Mullen’s press conference in Tokyo, said, “Defense Secretary Robert Gates will visit China next month, visit the current difficulties of Sino-US relations one is the lack of military contacts between the two countries and exchanges over the past few years, the relationship between the two military intermittent, among which we both did not benefit any party. “
Reuters agency commented that the timing of Gates’ visit comes as relations between the U.S. and China tried to repair the occasion. The world’s two largest economies hit by the relationship between Taiwan and the fight against military exercises. At the same time, China announced a Chinese military delegation Thursday to the United States. Official media said it was normal defense dialogue, PLA Deputy Chief of Staff Ma Xiaotian, the first 11 to attend bilateral defense consultations.
Taiwan since Washington announced the sale one pair, Beijing’s military relations with the United States put the freeze up. Since then, the U.S. secretary of defense until October this year was met for the first time. British “Financial Times” reported that Bill Gates has long wanted to visit China, but the last time the Pentagon was planning to visit Beijing’s rejected. The two sides try to make everything back on track, but also to visit the U.S. next month in time for the Chinese leaders before the restoration of bilateral relations.
U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates
In addition, Mullen 9 in Japan once again on the Korean Peninsula to China to express their dissatisfaction. Mullen said, “China’s influence on North Korea than any other country the world’s largest, which is the responsibility as a world power hope (China) noted this appeal, and make action.” 8, Mullen in South Korea also repeatedly said, “China’s responsibility” and “China to change its attitude,” he’s the tough talk by the world media coverage. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman at a regular press conference 9, said, “those who accuse China of artificially maintaining regional peace and stability in positive efforts to do what? Military deterrence can not solve the problem, will only exacerbate tensions in the region, China’s policy is in line with the Korean Peninsula and long-term interests of all parties, we oppose any act detrimental to regional peace and stability. “
Comments] [current events in the previous reviews (and sometimes part of the discussion in East Asia Sometimes the discussion in the focus of reviews), we have always stressed the view that:
● time over half a month today, we still want to draw Note “is a saying”
around the time “North Korea South Korea shelling military targets”, and the United States to “carrier version of the Yellow Sea drill” to “oral” to defend South Korea, the latest developments arising from a series of (including Central Russia and the U.S., and Japan, India, North Korea, South Korea’s formal response), so far, these are “permutations and combinations,” level “things” are to the back, a deeper level of “order with the combination of “do” council “, so we do not jump to conclusions, and please note that our assertion.
over half a month’s time today, we still want to draw attention to the claims.
● permutations and combinations in the third wave is at a critical point in time, Mullen’s no doubt these words has a “wealth of non-military sense”
At this level, please note that this passage, I quote:
a short stay in Japan, the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff Mike Mullen’s press conference in Tokyo said, “Defense Secretary Robert Gates will visit China next month to visit the Sino-US relations are one of the difficulties is the lack of military contacts between the two countries and exchanges over the past few years, the relationship between the two military intermittent, which Among the two sides did not benefit any party. “
commentators view in the East, because of the special international situation,” Sino-US high-level military exchanges, “Sino-US relations have long been given a” barometer “and” tagging “and therefore, permutations and combinations in the third wave is at a critical point in time (please note that this condition), serving as the senior U.S. generals, Mullen” choose Japan, “this point,” declared himself “the United States Defense Secretary Robert Gates to visit China next month will go to the news, no doubt with “a wealth of non-military sense.”
rather than who publicly threatened “if China took part in the Korean War, China’s economy is ready to return 100 years”, and “have a rest,” the U.S. military commander in South Korea is concerned, the U.S. active duty senior generals, “this time” no doubt the performance was “much more to understand the times!”
Nevertheless, we “have a rest,” who still have to remind two:
First, you have to “China’s economy,” ready to return 100 years, you “the U.S. economy” is prepared to return many years? In fact, from the “American veterans” out of his mouth so-called “China’s economy”, speech on the “intent” is concerned, beyond the economic sphere, then, for the mentally handicapped threat, China has a general early on the “active”, the another way given the answer —-”…… China prepared to sacrifice all the cities east of Xian …… but the United States have to prepare hundreds of cities were destroy ……”
“the answer” is given for several years, the result is “U.S. military intervention in Taiwan” on this slowly fade out
second, “the answer” is given for several years a, and is in the “American extreme hawk (example: former U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney, former U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, former U.S. Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, etc.)” are in the stage of making the United States when given, may be composed of these “extreme hawks team,” the official response to what is it? That American politicians have always hanging in the mouth, and extremely arrogant, “U.S. military intervention in Taiwan”, in this slowly fade out.
“lip service” and the “China threat theory” and the U.S. media’s “selective deafness”
addition to the several U.S. politicians ‘frantic’ a Fan, the once believed “the U.S. military have the ability to intervene in the Taiwan Strait”, and then all day long clamored for “China threat theory” of the U.S. media, the overall reaction is it? That is, before the world to a “lip service”, even “not hear” the real “China threat.”
Clearly, by the above history, especially the U.S. media on the matter of “selective deafness”, we can easily draw a conclusion: if the U.S. dares to let the Chinese back 100 years, at least they themselves must ready to back 100 years. In this regard, for a keen, “unilateralism” and “extreme hawks American team” knows the answer: The answer “is built in China with reliable strategic nuclear strike force based on Rumsfeld President not to go to China Xishan the strategic command center read the actual situation do?
We also advise “the U.S. economy,” an
third, to some extent on the East commentator also “willing to believe,” he remarks, “stressed” is “China’s economy,” Therefore, we may “also” could be understood as “economic areas” within a warning.
If so, this “warning” the idea is so little basis, which also happens to be before we have made a point of view, namely: the economic level, the North Korean military conflict, the worst results out of control, For China, not “hard landing” today? “global economic hard landing” do?
in the “global economic hard landing” in the background, if the “physical production” of China’s economy should be the primary back 100 years, then, mainly by the “virtual economy” to support the U.S. economy, due to economic, particularly financial more to “diehard”, relatively speaking, the U.S. economy will have more than 100 years back!
Obviously, if the development of the situation must be second to China, “Korean War”, we also advise “the U.S. economy,” one: the U.S. economy “at least be prepared to back 101 years”!
very clear, whether 100 years or 101 years, it is but in the “out of thin air count on fingers,” The reason we emphasize “101″ and “100″ when compared with, is our belief: Once the development of the situation to that step, “the U.S. economy will more severe than the damage the Chinese economy “.
We very much agree with” a few days ago is still very strong Mullen “in Japan” reveal “and” voice “
and on the “non-military level”, if out of the narrow pattern of bilateral, between the great powers in the game world wide angle up observation, what we do very much agree with “a few days ago is still very strong Mullen” in Japan’s “reveal” of “…….. the past few years the relationship between the two military intermittent, which we both did not benefit any party among the ……” “voice”.
Mullen of the “voice”, the “real” is exactly what we have always stressed a point
fact, write In addition to “high-level military exchanges,” the “military significance” in the “international political level” to observe the problem, then, Mullen’s the “voice”, the “real” is exactly what we have always stressed the view that: determination in the EU global strategy, “further” to China’s global strategy “substantive strategic close” before, “China Northeast Asia policy” is necessary to keep a high profile, that is: as much as possible to keep the Americans a chance to “United States Northeast Asia policy “always” rehabilitation “opportunities, which China’s global strategy for the most favorable.
U.S. policymakers understand,” has not completely rejected, “” rehabilitation “of the selection, the United States global strategy and most favorable
in turn, standing U.S. position to observe the problem, if we from the “United States Korea and Japan,” Foreign Ministers meeting, “United States, Japan,” the “triple alliance” integration progress. ” as’ America ‘meaning’ of the context, from “the point of view” to view Chama Lun’s “Zhefan voice”, it is easy to see in Beijing are preserved until today this opportunity, and Washington also “not completely reject “behind the U.S. decision-makers understand,” has not completely reject “the future” rehabilitation “of the selection of the U.S. global strategy is most beneficial.
so-called” rich non-military sense “
Clearly, in the above basis, we go back to previous questions, namely: serving as the senior U.S. generals, Mullen” choose Japan, “this point,” himself declared that “U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates to visit China next month will go to the news, no doubt with” a wealth of non-military sense “.
very clear that this so-called” rich in non-military sense, “referring to is the “U.S. policy in Northeast Asia” in the direction of East Asia “in a circle (the day the ship events, the internationalization of the South China Sea issue, South Korea continued to lead the military provocation,” North Korea South Korea shelling military targets “, the aircraft carrier version of the US-ROK military exercises in the Yellow Sea, the size of the U.S. and Japan unprecedented joint military exercises, etc.) “after the toss effect” rather than ‘America’ meaning ‘of the helpless, and eventually began to “put on a” “I was wondering” whether “rehabilitation” gestures.
this regard, we would like to emphasize three points:
is a “deliberate reminder”, also “warned” the countries: “Do not make me a fresh start!”
First, in terms of U.S. policy in Northeast Asia, this is only in the “put” an “attitude” and is “deliberately” in the “posturing” Obviously, the real intention of the move, not to “really wondering whether a new life (a return to six-party talks),” this step, but in “deliberate reminder” that is “warning” Japan, Korea, Australia, and even some national attention to the South China Sea: “Do not make me a fresh start “!
Secondly, in terms of U.S. global strategy, which is in the” put “an” attitude “and is” deliberately “in the” posturing “Obviously, the real intention of the move, has yet to “really wondering whether a new leaf (the entire U.S. strategic policy in East Asia to China to compromise),” this step, but in “deliberate reminder” that is “warning” the EU and Russia, even India and Japan: “Do not forced me to re-life “!
in the previous reviews, we have repeatedly stressed that the United States brazenly Korea dozens of lives sacrificed to create” Tiananmen incident “a major intent of both is: interrupt, or at least delay European Union (EUR) the process of landing on the Korean Peninsula, thereby preventing “Central Europe” strategy close to prevent the “Central Russia” in the Iraq nuclear issue to further strengthen strategic coordination, and then damage the U.S. worldwide, especially in the Middle East, EU the direction of seeking “outside the strict framework of the UN sanctions against Iran (in essence, China’s economic sanctions against China Finance),” The united front “efforts”, but also because through the “days of the ship incident”, plus the United States stirring up the “South China Sea” etc., on a global scale, especially in the direction of East Asia to seek “outside the strict framework of the UN sanctions against North Korea (the essence of China’s economic sanctions against China Finance),” the united front.
the addition , the United States asked South Korea to fully cooperate with the Lee Myung-bak government, to create tension on the Korean peninsula, there is a “balanced Middle East and South Asia” strategic intent.
Washington in Northeast Asia “Zhefan toss” reason “rather than ‘America’ meaning ‘of the most critical reason
Finally, and most importantly, to the day the ship incident, the internationalization of the South China Sea issue, South Korea continued military provocative result, “North Korea South Korea shelling military targets”, the aircraft carrier version of the US-ROK military exercises in the Yellow Sea, the U.S. and Japan on an unprecedented scale joint military exercises as “order”, Washington in Northeast Asia “Zhefan toss” reason “rather than” the United States’ intention “The most critical reason is not that Japan, Korea, Vietnam, etc.” do not want to meet, “but Japan, Korea, Vietnam, for” survival “and” the United States there are trust issues “and” not at all costs to “provide” the necessary co-ordination of the United States “.
on this issue, although South Korea Lee Myung-bak government is indeed in full swing with the United States, in their frustration” core national interests (economic stability, maintain peace on the peninsula) “The attachment of the” internal tension “is too strong (Note: The gold bells and Roh Moo-hyun’s” sunshine policy “also has an extremely strong and solid foundation of practical significance), and finally in the” at all costs “on the issue of its” full ” apart, and the United States is still a huge gap between expectations and the “nature of the gap”.
South Korea Lee Myung-bak government asked the United States and North Korea at the outbreak of a military conflict with the determination of intensity United States to do one thing
commentators in the East seems to , the so-called “nature gap”, to put a little popular, is “the United States asked South Korea Lee Invention and the Korean government at the outbreak of a military conflict with intensity, “the determination of a major United States against China, and is ready to” test report “to the EU, Russia, Japan, India, Turkey, Iran, Pakistan, in particular, “strategic test” in order to achieve three objectives:
“having intensity of the Korean War” approach, comprehensive, thoroughly test out “the current situation in Northeast Asia, East Asia and even to undertake the direction of the war determination “
First, in” all aspects (especially Pakistan, North Korea, Iran, Turkey and other countries) “before” having intensity military conflict on the Korean Peninsula “approach, a comprehensive, thoroughly test out the “China in Northeast Asia, or even the whole East Asia, South Asia, the most important word is far from the strategic direction, determined to undertake a war”, thus “very skillful” to a “similar distortion” the measurement, try to give a self-interested “test report”.
Obviously, this test report is not stressed, “China’s top priority in South Asia,” the “conditions” , and will not stress: This is a comprehensive, thorough, and the closest to a true test reports, test results show that: China is North Korea, and China’s other major strategic direction of the “strategic commitment” and “gold” In fact, with the United States, is also problematic.
U.S. policy makers seem to imagine:
Note that in this, the reason why we use “intensity military conflict on the Korean peninsula, “the word is that U.S. policy makers seem to imagine: In this” There is intensity military conflict “, the courage to sacrifice as long as South Korea, and North Korea both have some control over the scope of military conflict, then, only with the cooperation of Japan (will be Iran, North Korea sanctions extended to follow the more stringent U.S. economy, particularly financial attack China), then the United States ultimately may not need to “substantial involvement of military conflict on the Korean Peninsula,” China can be greatly consumed preparing, or being used South Asia, Middle East, Central Asia, the strategic direction of resources to continue to block EU strategy close to the weakening of the “Central Russia” started in the Middle East is the strategic cooperation, to prevent their own core interests in the Middle East, and even the interests of Kosovo (U.S. $-based system) is ” Central Russia, “the” strategic exchange “, so as to increasingly tight situation in the Middle East sort of relief, as tighter U.S. economy, particularly the financial cushion needed to continue to fight for time and space.
once … … the China through the “complex strategy means” to open the strategic situation would “immediately return to zero”!
Second, obviously, once the test results “or Yin Nanya reasons or for economic reasons (see Korean American veterans who choose this place, warned the Chinese once again involved in the “Chinese economy” back 100 years is by no means ready to whim), “leading to” China not involved in the second Korean War, “then, China through the” middle of the anti- guide “,” Zunwangrangyi “,” Eurasian high-speed rail, “a combination of such, including” political, economic, military, “the three levels of” complex strategic tool “, in South Asia, Central Asia, the Middle East in particular, the direction of further open strategic situation, it will “immediately return to zero”!
at the expense of South Korea, the United States tried to secure, or the way the Korean economy to achieve “one of the” intention
other words, the U.S. tried to sacrifice South Korea’s security, or the way the Korean economy to achieve “one of” intent.
Third, in the second, based on leaked beforehand Korea “Korea’s preparations to deploy U.S. tactical nuclear weapons”, its logical result is that “the deployment of U.S. strategic nuclear weapons, South Korea,” and this “military deterrence”, based on the combination of “US-ROK alliance,” the inherent economic advantages, “US-ROK military alliance “will take advantage of” subversion “isolated North Korean regime (if the North Korean government would not cooperate), or” conditional “support for South Korea launched” a unified Korean peninsula, “the process (if the Korean government to it).
Fourth, in the Third, based on the “deployment of U.S. strategic nuclear weapons, the Japanese public,” or even “trilateral US-Japan-ROK military alliance” will also put on the “agenda”.
Not only that, “U.S. policy toward South Asia” will be “The Northeast Asia results” immediately to “open up the U.S. Pakistan vertical channel”, and “China, Pakistan, horizontal truncated channel”, completely cut off by China, “the Iraqi nuclear issue” to the Middle East and even Africa as ways to increase their influence, a series of “strategic effort”, it combined with India, the strategic pivot, and thus the entire range of Asia, thoroughly complete a comprehensive strategic encirclement of China.
on this basis , and then force the Chinese, but also “EU-Russia” strategic re-adjust the relationship with the United States, in other words, is the total deconstruction of “Central Russia” based on the Iraqi nuclear issue intertwined strategic coordination.
this is ” U.S. South Asia policy “in the” out at large “levels” South Asia collapsed, “the attempt to achieve the results
Fifth, once achieved,” Fourth “, then we is not hard to see, and this is “American policy toward South Asia” in the “out at large” levels “South Asia collapsed,” the attempt to achieve results.
However, as we said before, in “US-ROK alliance,” the set of final self-contradictory “peep (carrier version of the US-ROK military exercises in the Yellow Sea” to “strongly counter”, “North Korea’s act of war” after, especially in China, the proposed “six-party talks held in early December, head of emergency consultations” after the Korean Government in the US-Japan joint military exercise to start the day (12 March) announced “allow some transport vehicles bound for the Kaesong industrial park,” as a symbol, Washington attempted to launch the Chinese economy, particularly financial attacks, or ” out at large (political and military level) “or to” steal (economic, particularly financial aspects) “to” South Asia collapsed, “the ambition, and finally because of South Korea within the” strong tension “and did not succeed, at least for now of.
whether Japan or South Korea, in forming a “trilateral US-Japan-ROK military alliance,” the issue becomes extremely cautious
addition addition, although before, in the days of the ship after the incident at the “US-ROK joint military exercise” has invited the Japanese Self-Defense Forces “observation”, and sent the South Korean military has observed the “US-Japan joint military” integration so that the United States, “US-Japan-ROK military alliance” with a trace of movement of the efforts, however, hand in China through the “ocean surveillance ship normal patrol waters of the Diaoyu Islands,” by hand “North Korea South Korea shelling military targets,” continued the Japanese and South Korea to maintain military pressure, and once the situation in North Korea out of control, the world economy may indeed be a hard landing, the Japanese and Korean economy is likely to be the last “big state interests” at the expense of the case in the United States has finally handed over to Japan, “US-Japan military alliance covers the Diaoyu Islands “This, Japan has been very eager to get the” card “, which seriously impact the” Sino-US relations, “then the Chinese to strengthen the Middle East, Latin America, the direction of the core U.S. interests, especially the” dollar standard “intensity of the attacks, which the U.S. officially pulled out of the “Northeast Asia’s problems in the Middle East to talk about” after the frame, whether in Japan or South Korea, in the formation of “directed at China, both Russia” and “Trilateral US-South Korea military alliance,” the problem seems very cautious on.
reason, as we said before, knowing that in these countries “in the United States, Europe and Russia” in the “Middle East issues to talk about”, “Middle East to talk about Kosovo,” “Eastern Europe, the Middle East talk about the issue” and “political, military, economic, especially financial are all together to talk about” the “high wind and depth” of the background, as long as China’s military pressure on these countries put in place, they really dare to sea, dare to fly, dare to know light and heavy it?
seems to have to make “abacus full of” Americans “out from the” angry
The real situation is this: whether it is finally to get Washington out of serious damage to Sino-US relations, “the US-Japan military alliance covers the Diaoyu Islands,” this “card” in Japanese, or Korean just been shelling military targets in South Korea, in China to maintain the military pressure, in the building, “US-South Korea tripartite military alliance” a common problem for China, its “cautious” attitude seems to have to make “abacus full of” Americans “out from the” angry .
commentators view in the East, which is “who the United States veterans (former commander of U.S. forces in Korea)” front foot in Korea just a warning, “China’s economy ready to back 100 years,” while another “American active high-ranking officers (Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff), “it says to go to Japan on a spit” voice “of” East Asia reasons “.
● make the U.S. military spit” voice ” , but the main reason is that the Mediterranean (Kosovo) direction and the direction of the Middle East “quick transaction”
fact that the U.S. military spit “voice”, much more than the “East Asian reasons “, but the main reason is that the Mediterranean (Kosovo) direction and the direction of the Middle East” quick transaction “.
According to sources in China, forced to intervene,” the Middle East peace process “, due to” major powers strategic exchange platform “has been moved from their initial” top priority “,” offset “, so as to” Central Russia “are willing to accept, but high degree of concentration of the core interests of the United States,” the direction of the Middle East “and therefore, in the” Mediterranean plan “under the cover of the Chinese directed at the United States’ Northeast Asia in the Middle East talks” coordinate, the “overall EU integration process” at an unprecedented speed to start.
We note that, following the ” U.S. and British special relationship “of Britain an excuse to funding, nuclear weapons and aircraft carriers in the” Topics “on the French play a” European military integration “of” spreading rumors action “, the EU’s two core countries – Germany and France is also prepared to do the same – the ready “to each other in the other country within the military”.
● Egypt have begun to take the “nuclear-free Middle East,” the topic to test the water “the Israeli nuclear issue” of the
In addition, we also note that the Chinese public, “the Israeli nuclear project”, the king of the Middle East, another place, walk between the EU and the United States of Egypt, in the “Europe” on the other may intensify the background, in order, as in the Middle East like Turkey to play a more important role, but also began to take the “nuclear-free Middle East,” the topic to test the water “the Israeli nuclear issue,” the.
worth emphasizing that, regardless of Turkey, or Egypt, there is also many years ago, “the nuclear issue.” Therefore, as “Zunwangrangyi” an important part, or as a North Korean nuclear issue and Iraq nuclear issue “alternative linkage” method, if the command line in “oil in U.S. dollars,” the “dollar standard” in Northeast Asia continues to “play tight,” then, once the situation on the Korean Peninsula situation out of control, these two “nuclear criminal record” where the king (also the one Syria), it is possible and “bound to lose six-party talks framework,” which “is bound to nuclear proliferation,” the Korean house on fire.
● State Councilor Dai talk visit to South Korea
in the previous reviews, the State Councilor Dai visit to South Korea for its good offices, we have emphasized: To be sure: State Councilor Dai brought nothing but an “ultimatum” and “Help”, its content or there are many, but it must include the two points, that is:
First, the “Today” in the “Central Russia and the U.S.” has been an intense game in the Middle East, the direction of the “Today”, as long as South Korea Do not continue to provoke the interest of China and North Korea to “tip the balance to” directly or indirectly been involved, willing to U.S. global strategy, particularly in the Middle East strategy to use, then there will be no “bombardment.”
on this issue, Washington “do not know,” North Korea “would shelling,” but Beijing “know”.
Second, if South Korea can not do “first”, then, “China’s proposed” in reference to “early December” on the last day, maybe another round of North Korean artillery is the beginning of the day, but the shelling, I am afraid it will not be playing in the innocuous island, and but to fight to the political and economic center of South Korea Seoul South Korea land targets direction. Obviously, it hit the Korean economy.
● came back from Korea, State Councilor Dai went to North Korea
We also note that came back from South Korea, State Councilor Dai went to North Korea, and was received by Kim Jong Il.
this, because “United States, Japan “still there” is neither completely reject “but also” to decline to accept the “Chinese proposal, but where the” bargain “, the intention is to stall for time, so we would like to note that State Councilor Dai bring this to North Korea not the other, should also be a “Help”, its contents or there are many, but we suggest that this visit should include such points, that is:
First, if South Korea can not “First”, then December 10 is over, North Korea have every right to “Paju City in Korea, an Army artillery unit Wenshan local time at 15:00 on November 28 about the” mistake “to launch inter-Korean Demilitarized Zone of a shell “in retaliation.
Second, if North Korea continues to threaten the United States, then, on December 10 over, China will no longer be” best to prevent the “North Korean nuclear proliferation out
● only “has to dominate, and want to continue to dominate the” forces of evil will be afraid, do not want to China to dominate the world, why be afraid of there?
on this issue, we would like to emphasize that State Councilor Dai Korea before last, has published an article stressing that “the idea that China will overtake the United States to dominate the world view is a myth, “so, in the East commentators view, North Korea, or whether other countries on the issue of nuclear proliferation, only” has to dominate, and want to continue to dominate the “forces of evil before be afraid, do not want China to dominate the world, why be afraid of there?
● advise U.S. decision-makers, or early child “China proposed” good
Thus, in the “full integration of the European Union” sudden acceleration cases, “the Israeli nuclear issue” is more and more countries to boycott the Middle East situation, in a word, in the United States unable to play down China’s “Northeast Asia Middle East talk about “the impact, especially in Japan, South Korea, two U.S. allies, or for core national interests or that they are worth mentioning because of internal tension, still in the” US-South Korea trilateral military alliance, “the issue of “looked around” the case, we advise U.S. decision-makers, or early child accept the “Chinese proposals” good! Otherwise, the loss of “six-party talks framework of the” constraints Korea, nuclear proliferation, proliferation of missile technology level will do What happened to China will no longer care!
In addition, we also advise the South Korean policy makers, or early child “China offer” good, at least have to do to ensure that the “first”, Otherwise, to “the direction of North Korean artillery Seoul”, Korean economy suffered a heavy blow when they find that they eventually fall into the “do not want to control China, the United States not care” dilemma.
Therefore, in “The EU fully integrated” sudden acceleration of the background, we hope in a “fight Hansha called” sudden reboot “Sino-US high-level military interaction”, can become a “United States, Japan” return “to Chinese proposal” start. As can talk out what is not important, important, China has reason to be “U.S. policy in Northeast Asia” remain a “rehabilitation” opportunity, “U.S. policy in Northeast Asia,” also “real action” to retain a “re- man “and” possible “, this is important, the consequences of not doing so, the permutations and combinations in the third wave slowly entered a substantive stage, it is like on the Mullen said …… America is not good for both sides! and the evolution of the situation in perspective from the Middle East, in particular, from the “wiki” to decrypt the complex background, and “capital control of the country” and “state-controlled capital,” the struggle between the point of view, the “United States, countries, especially the United States in this community (please note that our words) “special case!
Finally, the” wiki “to decrypt the complex background, we repeat that, either: it should be” capital control of the country “and” state-controlled capital “between capital and capital between countries and fierce collision between the interests of the country’s core product, so it is” independent of both the subordinate and because “the interests of capital of the dispute, it also” both subordinate and discrete in the “national interest of the dispute, in the” WikiLeaks “issue, for their own interests,” European countries “and” European capital “have their own special role to play.
This is precisely what we dished out in advance of “European Capital and American Capital” and “capital controls the state and state-controlled capital” on the topic of consideration.