The media said the United States a dominant position in the Asia-Pacific precarious hegemony is bound to end
Data Figure: U.S. forces stationed in Japan, the F-15C fighter group.
BEIJING, February 6, Hong Kong’s Wen Wei Po, on the 4th published comments that the U.S. military strategic focus is transferred to the Asia-Pacific, and enhance in the Asia-Pacific military presence, especially in the case of substantial reductions in military spending, ensure that the Asia-Pacific military strategy will not be affected, which indicates not only the United States to fight the military power “to maintain the” Asia-Pacific leading the strategic goals and strategic approach to strengthen the strategic goals and mission of the United States want to rely on the strategy of military pressure and action to curb and deter China .
article excerpts are as follows:
U.S. military strategic focus go to the Asia-Pacific, and enhance its military presence in the Asia-Pacific region, especially in the case of substantial reductions in military spending, but also to ensure that the Asia-Pacific military strategy is not the impact of both the United States to fight the military power “to maintain the strategic goals and strategic direction of the” Asia-Pacific’s leading, but also to strengthen the strategic goals and mission of the United States want to rely on the strategy of military pressure and action to curb and deter China.
After months of meticulously crafted, the new U.S. military strategy has finally been made. Named “maintain U.S. global leadership: the publication of the 21st century defense priorities,” the new military strategy report immediately caused strong repercussions in the world, especially the new U.S. military strategy, the focus of U.S. global strategic focus in Asia-Pacific region, The targeting of military strategy aimed at China and Iran. This gives the security situation in the Asia-Pacific region, China-US relations, US-Iran relations cast a tense haze. The world can not help but ask: the new U.S. military strategy and prove safety in China to get the desired results?
new U.S. military strategy, the introduction of the strategic environment and strategic objectives are: one, the U.S. domestic economic decline spacious, the debt crisis, the budget slashed; Second, the rise of Asia-Pacific economies, the rise of China, India;, the United States Deeply is no guarantee that leadership position, especially the fear of being out of Asia; Fourth, the U.S. economic recovery hopes in the Asia-Pacific, way out in the Asia-Pacific; five, the United States to maintain global leadership position, only maintain the leading position in the Asia-Pacific; Sixth, the United States to maintain leadership position in the Asia-Pacific, it is necessary to suppress a potential threat to the “super military, or that a potential enemy, and to eliminate a real threat to the current enemy.
prove safety in China is the core of the new U.S. strategy
Obviously, the new U.S. military strategy is subject to its strategic environment and strategic context, the strategic objectives and strategic tasks constraints, shows two significant features: First, to reduce and maintain, is to increase and prove safety.
years of the war in Afghanistan and the Iraq war, the United States is badly weakened, there a turning point in history, began the course of irreversible decline, unilateralism has come to the end of history, hegemonism has been declining, global leadership is difficult to maintain. Asian and emerging economies, especially the rise of the BRIC five countries, especially the rise of China is unstoppable. This is a very dominate the world situation to the formation of severe challenges and impact. The United States to maintain global leadership in economic and political powerless, and only by the superior military strength can also be “maintaining”.
However, the debt crisis, financial crisis led to severe budget cuts, making the strength of the U.S. military stretched growth, total inadequacy. The Obama administration has announced a decade reductions in military spending of $ 487 billion, should the Democratic and Republican parties can not reach an agreement in the government deficit reduction, military spending will be automatically reduced by $ 600,000,000,000 within a decade. All this is destined to the new U.S. military strategy highlights the reduced features. Reduced military spending led to the following series of military downsizing: First, to reduce the Army and Marines scale; Second is to reduce its military presence in Europe; “while fighting two wars reduced to” fight a war. respond to and deter enemies “.
At the same time, in order to maintain global leadership, we must first ensure that “maintaining the leadership position in the Asia-Pacific, the military strategic focus turned to the Asia-Pacific, and enhance the military in Asia exist, on the U.S. global strategy , the inevitable choice of the Asia-Pacific strategy. This is the most significant feature of the new U.S. military strategy. Or it can be said, This is a strategic starting point for a new military strategy, its strategic foothold.
In fact, the United States is also well aware of its leadership position in the global significant decline in the Asia-Pacific’s leading position precarious, so trying to use its super military “to” maintain ” United States or to “maintain” a moment, to “maintain,” I, is even more difficult. Can also say with certainty that the United States dominate the global leadership position, is bound with the multi-polar rule to the formation of the world and come to an end.
should be done to spare the strategic preparedness
For China, the new U.S. military strategy to prove safety in China is still underestimated, not be taken lightly, need to be taken seriously, and a timely manner as soon as possible to spare the strategic preparation and strategic response. Although China has repeatedly declared that China will never hegemony, never seek hegemony, again and again to China welcomes the U.S. presence in Asia, the regional issues in Asia can only rely on peaceful negotiations, opposed to resorting to violence and the threat of force against foreign meddling in the South China Sea dispute. But the U.S. insisted that the rise of China as its world dominance of the “threat”. Therefore, as early as before the introduction of the new military strategy in terms of economy and trade, political, diplomatic, military deployments and exercises deterrence, increasing to strengthen reduce China’s strategic space and room for development.
the rise of Asia, the rise of China, the rise of India, is a law of history dictates, not the will of the people, any people, any military alliance, U.S. military strategy can not be stopped. Development and prosperity in the Asia-Pacific region is the trend of peace and stability in the desire of the people, the end of American power to dominate the pattern of the development of a multi-polar world peace is the trend of the times. The United States to maintain in the 21st century “global leadership” and “a new military strategy, self-styled” Pacific’s first president with Obama and Hillary Clinton advocated “the 21st century is the Pacific Century”, was only wishful thinking, destined to it did not, end up 竹篮打水一场空 the end. (Kuai rut)