Iranian media said the attitude of the West and in 2003 a similar attack on former Iraqi
Date:2011-12-06Author:adminCategory:International militaryComment:0
data for: Iranian military parade on the show similar to the Chinese C-802 anti-ship missile
toward Western sanctions against Iran “off the faucet completely screw tight the last” another step out of step. 1 U.S. Senate unanimously adopted new sanctions against Iraq, asked the Central Bank of Iran would link with the global financial system, with the Central Bank of Iran to punish foreign banks doing business. It is almost necessary to completely cut off Iran’s oil exports. U.S. media immediately thought that this will affect China — the biggest buyer of Iranian oil. In fact, the United States as members deliberately to “force” in China. The EU also launched a new round of sanctions against the day of the Iranian measures. Tehran, 2, is diametrically opposed to another outbreak of anti-British demonstrations. Hostility between Iran and the West will be out of control it? Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak, then give the impression that a lot of imagination: Israel does not seek to attack Iran, “but may have no choice.” “Scottish Herald” 2 said that at present the West as critical of Tehran attacked Saddam in 2002, as the immediate situation is reminiscent of 2003, months before the Iraq war. But the UAE Gulf News Network article said, the more drums the more urgent knock, against Iran is not so simple, however, will make the Middle East into a sea of ??fire, because Iran is not Iraq.
U.S. sanctions will hurt China?
According to Iran’s Islamic Republic News Agency reported a new outbreak of Tehran 2, anti-British demonstrations in support of the impact of the British Embassy in action. After attending Friday prayers, the demonstrators poured into the center of Revolution Square, the burning of the British and Israeli flags, shouting “Death to Britain”, “support the seizure of a second spy nest (British Embassy)” and other slogans. But the report did not mention the number of demonstrators.
after ten hours, the United States Senate by 100 votes in favor, 0 votes against the adoption of new sanctions against Iraq. Agence France-Presse said that Senator Menendez and Republican Sen. Kirk co-sponsored the amendment, called the central bank to freeze contacts with Iran’s financial institutions in the United States assets. This will apply to the purchase and sale of Iranian oil or related products for the purpose of dealings with Iran’s non-US central bank. Menendez said: “This is a peaceful diplomatic means to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons, the biggest opportunity.”
in some U.S. analysts, the Senate is significant that this is the “kill” Iran’s economic lifeline the most effective way. United States, “Journal of the front page” website said on Tuesday Iran’s central bank cut ties with the international financial system is the only “can overwhelm the Iranian regime,” the economic sanctions programs, the oil is Iran’s main source of income, existing sanctions have severely limited the Iran is using the international financial system, the ability of the oil trade, Iran’s central bank is an important intermediary Iranian crude oil exports. “Wall Street Journal,” said the new measures aimed at forcing banks to take the world with similar economic sanctions, the United Kingdom. Previously announced to cut off Iran the British banking ties with the British financial system, it is this severe sanctions to induce Iran to the impact of students on Tuesday, the British Embassy in Tehran.
U.S. media also quick to link this measure with the Chinese. “Wall Street Journal” said, according to the sanctions, foreign financial institutions will not be allowed contact with the Central Bank of Iran, or they will be isolated from the outside of the U.S. financial system. In theory this will affect Iran’s oil and China — the biggest buyer of U.S. Treasury bonds. “I can not expect China to respond.” U.S. Deputy Treasury Secretary David Cohen told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said. United States, “Business Week” that, according to the U.S. Energy Information Agency statistics, the biggest buyer of Iranian crude oil in China, Japan, India, Italy and South Korea. China supports the four United Nations sanctions, but Beijing and the U.S. allies in Asia and Europe to buy Iranian oil has always been opposed to sanctions in Iran’s energy sector. AFP reported that Richard Lugar, Republican lawmakers on the new sanctions would alienate China’s concerns to be laughed at, he criticized China for sanctions against Iran is not taken seriously, “we must either compete on the Chinese diplomatic or may go to war with the Iranians. ”
However, the Obama administration to approve the sanctions a bit skeptical. “Business Weekly” reported that the Obama administration opposed the amendment on the grounds that it would threaten an important partner in Asia and Europe’s oil supply, the international sanctions against Iran could undermine the alliance, while oil prices soaring. U.S. State Department Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs temperature Dixieerman said: “The danger exists, in fact means that oil prices will have more money to promote Iran’s nuclear ambitions to achieve, not less.”
“This is actually a multi-edge sword of sanctions.” Shanghai International Studies Foreign Policy Research Institute, Li Wei, build two of the “Global Times” correspondent said. He said economic and trade exchanges with Iran is not only a Chinese national, raising the price of oil is not good for many countries. On the Iranian nuclear issue, China can not go along the West line of thought.
“pave the way for a military attack on Iran?”
echoes with the United States, the European Union on the 1st also increased sanctions against Iran to freeze the 143 entities in the European Union’s assets, and prohibits the entry of 37 Iranians. The EU said in a statement the same day, Iran’s hostility to the United Kingdom is regarded as hostile to the entire European Union, the EU will take “appropriate” measures in retaliation. As the impact of the British Embassy in Tehran in retaliation by the British government ordered the Iranian embassy staff must at 14:00 on the 2nd to leave. But the EU failed to France’s oil embargo on Iran to agree. French “Le Nouvel Observateur” quoted the scholars saying that the oil embargo is not feasible, it will push oil prices day (on the next edition) so that the entire Western economic collapse, while China and India, Iran will take the opportunity to get more share of oil. United States, “Christian Science Monitor,” commented that the Iranian oil embargo, the EU barely escaped, but Tehran is not easy to detect a hint of fear, that this week, a sharp deterioration in relations between Iran and Europe, Russia and China will increase the economic impact on Iran.
Iranian media did not show a deterioration of relations with the West’s concerns. Iranian News Channel 2 to “Iran’s hard to shake the United Kingdom” as a theme that, although British Foreign Secretary William Hague urged the EU to take more stringent measures against Iran, including freezing the assets of Iran’s central bank in Europe, but representatives of EU countries, but in this into a split on the issue. The station also accused the British “set a dangerous trap for Iran”, Iran took the road of confrontation with the West.
confrontation between Iran and the West will go? In analyzing this issue, “war” is a word mentioned in many media. British “Guardian” 1 said the West’s tough stance on Iran now, with a similar situation before the invasion of Iraq, sanctions only pave the way for a military attack on Iran. “Scottish Herald” 2 to “demonize the smell of war with Iran” in the title that many in the West has been portrayed as the Middle East to Iran, the source of all evil, look at Iran’s growing political and military pressure, sanctions, disinformation, propaganda, reminiscent of 2003, months before the Iraq war. By breaking off diplomatic relations, isolation and demonization of Iran, the West has taken a dangerous step forward unknown.
Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak’s statement gives the leaves more room for imagination. “Washington Post” to 2 “for the Israeli defense minister say no to attack Iran, but may have no choice” as the title says, 1 Barak said that Israel does not want war with Iran over its nuclear program, but at some point may have no choice, now do not want to fight against Israel, Iran’s nuclear facilities, but it is still a “last choice.” Associated Press, said Barak hinted Israel might not be informed in advance on the world’s largest country to launch a military strike, he said: “Israel is a sovereign state, is responsible for Israel’s security, the future and the survival of the Israeli government, army and security forces.”
Some Western media have joined to the agitation for war against Iraq. “Los Angeles Times” 1 said, look back at history, weak in the face of aggression is almost difficult to understand or forgive the Nazis in the 1930s prepare for war when the “base” organization in the 1990s, when the accumulation of power, why are Western inaction ? Now able to significantly delay Iran’s nuclear program only reliable option is to carry out bombing campaign, but who can imagine President Obama will do things his predecessor did not do. Western policy-makers failed to stop Hitler and Osama bin Laden before the attacks on Westerners, today we are experiencing the same failure, because we are unable to face the growing threat of the Islamic Republic. Israeli “Haaretz” 2 by the “secret war” in the title, said the explosion, deadly computer viruses and other kinds of “accidents” that destroyed Iran’s nuclear program actions under way, or Western intelligence agencies, either internal opposition groups, or both. This shows that the war is already underway, although no declaration of war or confirmed.
“Iran is not Iraq,”
rising threat of war in the West front, Iran did not show weakness. Singapore’s “TODAY” 1 said, facing Western military threat against Iran’s nuclear facilities, Iran’s leaders did not stand by and do nothing, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard has recently improved the tone, the Revolutionary Guards air force commander Haji Zadeh said that once the war, “Iran will attack NATO missile defense facilities.” British “Financial Times” said the Iranian Revolutionary Guard commander and the Defense Department in recent times that they have the ability to fight back. One analyst said: “The irony is that Iran, under international pressure to become more aggressive, Saddam Hussein or Gaddafi or under pressure to open the door welcome into the inspectors, or to stop nuclear activities, but Iran is still its own way.” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Foundation, an Iran expert at 萨贾吉普尔 said: “They want to send a signal that Europe is not without cost to increase pressure on Iran has revenge of the Road.”
Iran’s “revenge way “that the West has not dare to start an important reason. German “Bild” 2 said that now the West has been awakened, but experts believe that the military attack on Iran would be a disaster, Iran occupies an important oil transport channel, if war broke out, the bone marrow against the Western economies. Former British Foreign Secretary David Miliband and the “Oxford Analytica,” CEO 穆萨维扎德 He on the 1st joint in the British “Financial Times” on the “sleepwalking to Iran, the danger of war,” wrote the title, the recent International Atomic Energy agencies report Iran’s nuclear program, Israel’s military strikes on the debate about the best time to combat the impact of private discussions and the British Embassy in Iran before the diplomatic consequences of the rift is to be extended to mistrust new and dangerous level. But this is not now or in 2012, a military strike argument. A number of Iranian nuclear facilities, Tehran is not the lack of weapons, ammunition and revenge goals. Saudi Arabia, Israel and the U.S. facilities in the Middle East and the Strait of Hormuz will become revenge targets. It is necessary to prevent war with Iran.
UAE Gulf News Network, said a commentary from the capital of Tel Aviv and the West noise getting louder and louder, you can easily achieve the tipping point, if Iran persist, Israel and its supporters “is not only known to bite “deterrence will lose credibility. But Iran is not Iraq, if you really want to get involved, the Middle East will fall into a sea of ??fire, the West may have to consider options coexistence with a nuclear Iran.
British “Guardian” 1, said Iran’s Foreign Secretary William Hague announced the move contrary to international law students, but for years the West and the UK policy on Iran as a series of flagrant violation of international law, many military offensive threat, calling them “all options are on the table.” The hawkish attitude of the West, many of the unfounded rumors, based perhaps the West must change course, good faith negotiations in order to avoid a regional and global disaster. ▲
(“Global Times” December 3, 2011 No. 01 version)
“Global Times” copyright works without the written authorization is forbidden and offenders will be held liable.
. OtherContent_01 p {line-height: 23px; margin: 0px;} . Icon_sina,. Icon_msn,. Icon_fx {background-position: 2px -1px}. icon_msn {background-position:-25px-1px;}. icon_fx {background-position:-240px-50px;} share:
No comment yet!