North Korea launched a satellite may be intended to guide the United States concerned about the situation on the peninsula
100,000 North Korean soldiers and civilians grand rally to celebrate the satellite launch business activities
International Herald Tribune article North Korea announced its withdrawal from the six-party talks, North Korea announced that it is from the satellite to be launched so far, the international society’s most shocking piece of news; but also a permanent member of the Security Council unanimously condemned North Korea launch satellites, the unexpected, makes sense thing.
say it makes sense, because the DPRK Foreign Ministry had previously said: If the Security Council for its satellite launching a presidential statement from North Korea will no longer attend the six-party talks, nuclear disablement will will be restitution, and announced its commitment to withdraw from it only in practice. Said in surprise, left the six-party talks is because such a platform, North Korea in fact no better way to fight for their core national interests.
launch a satellite to withdraw from the six-party talks, and many occurred in the first half of this year on the progress of the Korean Peninsula nuclear posture is with deep-seated reasons. New U.S. president Barack Obama since he took office, the delay statement on the Korean nuclear issue, nor the six-party talks, proposed the idea of ??the next phase of development. In this case, North Korea hopes to launch the satellite means to cause great concern in the United States, thus promoting the contact between the U.S. and the DPRK. In fact, the history of the Six-Party Talks, the situation is not did not happen. North Korea has repeatedly called by similar means, including nuclear explosions, to accelerate the national concern over the situation on the Korean peninsula.
the other hand, does not rule out in this process, North Korea has jumped the gun to achieve its nuclear technology to its core strategy. From the present point of view, North Korea has nuclear weapons and developing long-range nuclear weapons delivery techniques, such as rocket or ICBMs, should be the overriding national strategy. Just as the international environment changes and the tightness of U.S. policy toward the DPRK, the DPRK will choose a nuclear process and speed only. Beneficial to the national interest in the environment may temporarily so that degree of its nuclear power. But the essence, North Korea in the process, did not completely abandon the idea of ??developing nuclear technology.
Therefore, to evaluate the six-party talks back, so that all aspects of a hard work especially in China a platform for dialogue, although after a difficult, but in fact largely delayed the tension on the Korean Peninsula, and to show the world the Northeast Asia security decision-making rational factors. Regardless of whether the six-party talks resume, it is to achieve its historic function. And this feature in the future to ease regional and international security sensitive issues, will continue to have a demonstration effect.
course, the multilateral talks on the definition of the right to speak and the right to convene the country not only concentrated in the more concentrated in the participating countries. Therefore, we can not hope a simple six-party talks on North Korea to solve the problem completely. In delaying the crisis and create a rational, we of course need to be more directly involved in North Korean nuclear issue multi-game. To know that any solution to the problem of international politics is not about them, but in the interests of the six-party dialogue and reason behind the contest.
the security of Northeast Asia, there are various powers of rational decision-making and crisis control, the security situation in Northeast Asia is not going to fundamentally subversive. But the key question is, left the six-party talks, North Korea, what kind of rational platform to fight for its national interests?
recommended “International Herald Tribune” blog: http://blog.sina.com.cn/m/xqdb