Military of China, force comment.
Military of China, force comment.

Data for: NATO formed the NATO multinational rapid reaction force

中广网 Beijing July 22 news (reporters Xu Jiahui), according to Voice of China “concept of military evening peak,” reported : media said on July 18th at the EU foreign ministers meeting, EU High Representative for Foreign and Security Policy Ashton presented a report to promote the building of the EU defense, including a permanent EU military headquarters, in order to achieve the EU’s independent military action planning, coordination and command. Ashton overwhelmed by what the proposed strategic context, if the proposal is passed, the future EU military headquarters will play what role, related topics, the reporter interviewed a military expert Song Xiaojun (microblogging).

divergence of interests within NATO forces to form a fist disaster

many European countries have become members of NATO, NATO’s unified military leadership in perform. Why do we build EU military headquarters.

Song Xiaojun that NATO was a product of the Cold War, was responsible for Europe against the Soviet Union as the core of the Warsaw Pact. NATO after the Cold War tried in the U.S., the UK, driven in one fell swoop the Soviet military empire complete this huge crush, but did not do what.

At the same time, national interests within NATO orientation also occurred in a relatively large differences, such as France and the United Kingdom, France and the United States, Britain and the United States, they have a lot of orientation between the divergence of interests . The most typical manifestation of war in Libya, the countries have a lot of inconsistencies. In this case, the EU should set up a new security organization to give up not with a fist clenched with the original model, which is the logical corollary.

the proposed EU military headquarters in some countries due to profit-driven

if Ashton’s proposal is passed, the future EU military headquarters will play what role?

Song Xiaojun that was more integrated European internal security issues. In Africa, there are common interests between Britain and France, because there have their colonies; in South Africa, there are a lot of their mineral investment. These interests together to help the same action.

present, they are tight against Germany, because in this round of debt crises in Europe, only persist in the German manufacturing industry is strong euro, is the real deal. France 1.4 trillion of debt is about to expire, Italy drained after the next is probably French. Russia is also facing a relatively huge crisis, but have the resources to integrate their economies into a normal cycle of industrialized countries also need help. Thus, to France and Germany as the core of the Eurosystem, that the French foreign intelligence and research capability with the German manufacturing industry, coupled with Russia’s resources, they use the majority of the population of the Weimar Triangle Regional integration, this is their final reasons.

each has or by the EU military headquarters in childbirth

Ashton on the establishment of a European military headquarters proposal was a “Weimar Triangle”, also that France, Germany and Poland support, but this was firmly opposed to the UK, why is there so much difference?

Song Xiaojun that Britain has been in Europe and the United States 脚踩两只船, closer to the United States. In the new European military organization among the core countries, if Russia’s accession, Russia, France, Germany, the three most powerful countries, whether the war in Iraq or Libya, which, at first in Germany to abstain, Russia is also true. The distance between them with the United States than the United Kingdom with the distance between the United States much,

because the Germans had the lessons of World War II; the French revolution, with Russia have had a history of the French Revolution and 1917 Soviet revolution, and their left-wing forces are relatively stronger in this case, their political aspirations with the demands of British politics is certainly a relatively large distance, so that the UK is bound to oppose.