Military of China, force comment.
Military of China, force comment.

Chinese Navy is converted Kuznetsov aircraft carrier

Japanese aircraft carrier announced plans on China’s response seems the most tension, Japan’s defense minister accused China of 29 aircraft is not transparent, clear “in the end what the word” , “is the regional tensions caused by the factors.” A day earlier, Japan’s Chief Cabinet Secretary said almost exactly the same words. Japan presented to China did not like very annoyed that they consult a detailed report of the aircraft carrier construction.

China-made aircraft carrier is “what for”? Anyway, certainly not pulling cotton or wheat shipped with the first aircraft carrier as a “research and training platform,” and certainly not with the athletes training glider. Equipment on the aircraft are combat aircraft, it can open to attack and bomb away. These are obvious, it needs the Chinese Defense Ministry, “transparent” it? Beijing’s military to avoid that these students can speak the truth, China’s maintenance of peace in East Asia as an expression of faith.

Japan evidently want to know what the Chinese military’s specific use for the Japanese aircraft carrier program. First, they are too anxious. Chinese carriers have not yet officially launched, the more necessary to combat the formation of a real time, it is carefully designed, how the Chinese strategic deterrent to the aircraft carrier as a tool when it? Second, even to the careful study of how to use the Chinese aircraft carrier, the Chinese have an obligation to aircraft carrier cruising the roadmap and timetable are played back at any time, to the Japanese Ministry of Defense one?

Japan often ask the Chinese Navy’s “strategic intent” is what they have repeatedly asked China Fleet “why” to get out of the first island chain, now brings a knot and asked the Chinese aircraft carrier to be used to “do what . ” They think of China in accordance with a well-knit “conspiracy” action, every step of China’s one of a series of precise steps. About when the Japanese militarism really is so dry, but China is not.

both China and the Navy out of the first island chain, or the construction of aircraft carriers today, China is not deliberately committed, they are the natural growth of China’s overall action. The world’s major powers have aircraft carriers, and some medium-sized countries have, to today’s Chinese-made aircraft carrier if you do not, probably Chinese-made aircraft carrier than it should be more attracted strange. Similarly, China’s fleet to Blue Ocean, lying on the sea than it is always more around the world and China’s international trade, but also in tune with today’s globalization.

Chinese aircraft carrier is clearly not used to dealing with a specific country, that country is neither Japan nor the United States nor South Asian countries, because China did not like any of them to do a country strategy for will hit China’s peaceful development is a sincere desire. On the other hand, who tried to take the initiative to use military pressure to force China, China’s military resources will be mobilized to counter them, if necessary, the aircraft carrier will join, then it is necessary that China’s other strategic tools to be added.

China do need to respond appropriately to external demands, increase the transparency of Chinese military. However, individual countries should not have been relieving people, their own set of habits and experiences in China, forced head, forcing China to disclose the so-called plan does not exist. They should carefully study the implications of China’s peaceful rise, China is not attacking the country, military means always the case by the Chinese people should be used as a last resort, rather than Western theories often think of peace and war, which means the highest price on Which.

want to stop pondering the Japanese aircraft carrier made in China “intention” and torture yourself, do not turn with the Chinese people can not answer the question to torment us. ▲

. OtherContent_01 p {line-height: 23px; margin: 0px;} (edit: SN031)