South Australia-US air guess 2018 to 1:7 defeat F-35
data for: the U.S. F-35 Joint Strike Fighter
data for: People’s Liberation Army Naval Air Force Su-30MKK2 fighters patrolling the South China Sea.
newspaper correspondent Chen Zhaoxiang “2018, U.S. Air Force, clashed over the South China Sea, with the Chinese air force Su-35 fighter defeated a U.S. F-35 and F/A -18E/F “Super Hornet” fleet, the great victory achieved 7:1 … “This description comes from Australia,” Air Power “published March 30,” 2018: United States vs. South China Sea, “a text, the author card Los □ Koop published numerous articles before the articles related to China’s military power, claiming that the Chinese air force modernization has been a threat to the United States and its allies in strategic security, emphasizing the non-F-22 not enough to restrain China’s new generation fighter.
“2018, the South China Sea, 16 degrees north latitude, 114 degrees east longitude, the U.S. Navy’s ‘Reagan’ aircraft carrier battle group 4 F-35C fighter cover for the other four are F/A-18E/F ‘Super Hornet’ aircraft approaching the Yongxing Island. “in the beginning of the article, Carlo □ Koop with the” one country, “alluding to China, creating a fiery scene: “a country” to step up exploitation of the South China Sea oil and gas fields, and the massive presence in the Yongxing Island, the South China Sea route blocked, the U.S. so determined to use military force to expel the Yongxing Island.
Then, Koop and fictional “American pilot Captain Charles □ Brown” in the mouth, about the Chinese Air Force is how to make the U.S. experience, “South Waterloo”: the beginning, F-35 fleet airborne radar enemy four Russian-made Su-35 fighter jets took off from the Yongxing Island, the intention to intercept the U.S. military. But U.S. pilots high aspirations, because each F-35C aircraft are equipped with four AIM-120D AMRAAM, and airborne optical distributed aperture system that allows multiple targets simultaneously with combat pilots to effectively avoid the missiles. We intend to take it for granted over the horizon by virtue of stealth and combat capability, according to “first discovered, the first shot, first destroy the” simple procedure, to a “aerial hunting turkey” contest. They even easier to think of military aircraft manufacturer’s advertisements: “maneuvers to avoid it does not matter, as long as you make a turn the missile.”
However, the fighting did not like “Captain Brown,” as expected development. When the Su-35 fighter jets to reach 60 sea miles away when, F-35C fighter aircraft Su-35 to each fired two missiles, in order to ensure “total destruction.” After a “short and long” wait, F-35 aircraft electronic warfare systems on display, only one Su-35 was hit. Americans of good luck coming to an end point, superior mobility to escape other Su-35 missile to Mach 2.25 speed sprint, the distance between the two sides quickly shortened to 40 miles, three Su-35 shot 12 to U.S. cluster pieces of R-77 active radar guided air to air missiles, the Americans erupted in panic, some fierce open afterburner, trying to use wide-angle turn to get rid of the missile track, while desperately release decoys, but no R-77 missiles eat that, then mercilessly tore up four F-35C, jointly and severally responsible for the attack of the “Super Hornet” kill three, bringing the U.S. air war to “1:7″ the surprising than the end of the war damage . Debris into the aircraft, “Captain Charles □ Brown,” the body, he Renzhaojutong start parachuting equipment. U.S. experience, “South Waterloo.”
In addition to stealth, and what will not work
long-term study of air combat as an expert, Carlo □ Koop’s reputation with a series of PLA modernization and stop criticizing the United States F-22 fighter article has been familiar to Chinese readers. This provocative, “South China 2018 China-US air combat,” the article, not so much create the “China threat theory, the Air Force,” it is more Carlo □ Koop used to stop the Royal Australian Air Force F-35C aircraft to continue to purchase the “battle call to arms” . It is reported that Australian Air Force has realized they have to purchase 100 F-35C fighter aircraft can not survive in high-intensity conflict.
article stressed that with the Chinese and Russian anti-stealth technology, the West’s survival depends not only on next-generation stealth fighter capability, but also including speed, altitude, maneuver through the high deflection rate to avoid a variety of missiles the use of stealth and electronic warfare equipment and other interference-air missile capability, “Unfortunately, fitted out for the next 10 years the United States and its allies, the F-35 series aircraft, the lack of similar F-22 ‘Raptor’ fighter as high-altitude penetration and supersonic cruise capability, they can only rely entirely on their stealth and electronic warfare self-protection devices to achieve this on the battlefield is not enough. ” Carlo □ Koop pointed out, stealth once spent, airspeed of Mach 1.5 F-35 fighters can not airspeed of Mach 2.25 and Su-35S fighters in close combat. Moreover, Russia is actively developing a wavelength of 24-30 cm L-band high-power radar that can detect and track lock 70 sea miles within 0.01 square meters of the goal, China is also undertaking similar efforts, particularly its new air marshals service -2000 and -200 AWACS air marshals seemed to work in the L-band, the purpose is for the stealth fleet, coupled with strong construction and Russia “network-centric warfare,” the nature of a set of operational and intelligence C4ISR command and control system, the United States and its allies will column filled with a large number of F-35 stealth fighters will be greatly reduced. “With the stealth performance, BVR combat, the Western Air Force from 1991 to 2003 won more than asymmetric warfare, but this scenario will not recur in the future.”
the end of the article, Carlo □ Koop tells his own true intentions of writing this article: China and the Russian Air Force in response to the rapid modernization of the United States is necessary to consider the F-22 equipment to freeze the size of the decision and a close ally to re-examine the sale of F- 22 fighters of the possibilities.
speculation “U.S. war” with an attempt to
Western think-tanks have recently been launched the guise of “Sino-US war” on China to South China Sea, Malacca Strait, the “second island chain” and even the Indian Ocean to resist the expansion of U.S. military forces who were the “new script” is also emerging, which won the military conflict with China the end of the addition, a “China threat” propaganda material.
translator who has been involved in famous former U.S. Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger, “the next war,” the military observers in Hong Kong introduced the West to promote their own think tank, began to follow the novelist’s routine, the investigation will depend on the past reports, papers, data and charts to express the defense point of view, change to the public loved the story form of promotion, the middle less a young boy of the main data model calculations and war games, but more true in the international fight scenes, and almost like a real a story, virtually to attract the eye, making it easier to accept by the public and even the military. Such as the U.S. Rand Corporation published in 2007, “in-depth Dragon: China’s anti-intervention strategy and its impact on the United States,” a text, this eloquent characters of “narrative report” highlighted several “help against mainland China Attack of the advanced weapons, “later became the United States to sell arms to the US-Taiwan military’s” soft advertising. ” ▲