U.S. military transport aircraft intended to create a new breakthrough in stealth enemy air defense network (Figure)
U.S. experts envisioned a new stealth transport aircraft in flight resembles a B-2A stealth bomber
BEIJING, March 9, 2007: According to the U.S. Defense News reported on the 8th, the U.S. Pentagon’s Special Operations Officials recently said that U.S. special forces 2020 need a new type of stealth transport aircraft, to break through the enemy’s increasingly improved radar and missile systems. He said the U.S. military’s 2014 Quadrennial Defense report must make an explicit decision.
responsible for special operations and low intensity conflict and the independence of the Assistant Secretary of Defense Michael G · Vigers 4 interview, said some extent, as the signal attenuation and electronic attack techniques development, the United States must seriously consider the viability of the development and deployment of special forces more remote air platform. “We immediately decided that I did not need to purchase anything, but in the 2014 quadrennial defense review must make an explicit decision.”
currently maintained by the U.S. Special Forces helicopters and fixed-wing aircraft in the aircraft fleet mix, For example, a C-130, projection forces. Although not yet know the requirements of the new special forces transport aircraft shape and invisible costs, but Victrex says it will definitely “not cheap”, and look like the improved C-130 transport aircraft, stealth aircraft like the traditional . He also said that the demand for such transport will determine the range is a land-based transport, rather than carrier-based aircraft.
Pentagon maintains F-22 stealth fighters and B-2 stealth bomber, but the development of radar technology to avoid the requirements of their plans out of a very different plane. In this regard, Banc of America Securities – Merrill Lynch analyst 罗纳德爱普 Houston said: “This is a difficult task, the aircraft must carry a heavy weight.” He said that the new stealth is likely a wing transport aircraft fit body aircraft. U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration briefing presented a concept of wing-body aircraft body together, that has a thick airfoil body of a flying-wing aircraft. However, Epstein said, flying-wing design “can not meet the capacity needs, especially when heavily armed military needs.”
Epstein said that another possible option is swept wing type aircraft. This design resembles a flying B-2 bomber, and transport capacity is more like a C-130 transport aircraft. In this regard, senior Pentagon officials and defense analysts said that in the era of improving air defense capabilities, the U.S. does need a new stealth transport aircraft. However, the former U.S. Defense Department project analysis and evaluation director, now a Washington think tank Strategy and Budgetary Assessments analyst Barry Watts (Barry Watts) said: “The funding is still a major problem in the special forces I can for special forces financing required for its transport platform skeptical. “
However, the face of efforts to improve the ability to respond to U.S. military intervention against potential adversaries, the Pentagon leadership seems to have decided to maintain its leading position. A few weeks ago, the 2010 Quadrennial Defense Review said the ability to break through or circumvent anti-access systems of weapons and vehicles “to protect their own national interests, to key areas of basic security.” The U.S. defense and national security adviser, Peter * Huss said the power to create such weapons will reshape the library to discuss the Department of Defense spending. Huss said: “I think the important debate about the defense budget within five years there will be close to the field of anti-.”
in the next few years, the U.S. special forces will use its modified V- 130 transport aircraft and helicopters to send troops. But in the next decade, the air defense system locking aircraft radar, infrared and sound models of capacity will gradually increase. In this regard, Victrex, said air defense environment crises, particularly those of advanced, dual digital air missiles, which “prompted us air force – navy and air force – to penetrate these defenses and reduce the signal characteristics to improve electronic attack capability. “He said that if there is no other choice, he hopes to choose the B-2 special forces or its successor model, because the C-130 transport aircraft to use its terrain difficult to penetrate enemy air defense tracking radar. In this regard, Watts endorse: “Faced with dual digital air missiles, upgraded C-130 transport aircraft can not handle such a job.”
Wei Gesi, said the new stealth transport aircraft shape and MC -130 transport is different. “If you want to get the invisibility, it will more like a stealth aircraft.” However, not everything is possible. For example, Victrex, said: “You need to maximize payload and aircraft survivability trade-off between a large number of factors.”
Victrex that the Pentagon may decide to purchase a variety of aircraft to meet Special Forces requirements. Parts of the world, not every long-range stealth transport aircraft used to, so special forces might get a “high – low mixed aircraft fleet.” However, although “not all incidents are used to stealth transport aircraft, it can play a role only when a small number of cases, however, when needed, you will understand what is they want.”
Victrex that when the special forces transport aircraft are usually an upgraded version of military transport aircraft, but continue to improve the transport of conventional forces, military transport aircraft concept may no longer work. He said that is responsible for special operations and low intensity conflict and independence of the department will pay close attention to Department of Defense related technical work. Although the use of U.S. troops in the field today, lessons learned will save time, but it still takes more than a decade. “Moreover, the scope of activities affected by the special forces of the next generation of transport aircraft is likely to take off from ground-based, rather than ships.
this, Victrex explains:” the enemy’s capabilities will force you to retreat further, they also threaten you in the vicinity of military bases. After that, you will certainly find ways to break each other’s defense system, while the other’s defense system will definitely give you a big trouble. Depth and location of enemy targets would complicate the issue. Range of issues will force you to choose land-based aircraft. “However, Victrex also added, such as attacks on coastal targets in the implementation of such tasks, the sea-based capabilities might be able to play a role.
Lexington Institute defense analyst Luo Thompson pointed out that the huge purchases special forces may reduce the attractiveness of Washington, he said, although U.S. politicians have been very obsessed with special forces, “but if the special forces began to ask for a lot of money to buy equipment such as stealth machine, then it will diminish the attractiveness of . “Moreover, Thompson also said that with the increase in procurement costs, Congress will be spending details on the discussion of federal funds, he said:” With the increase in Special Forces budget, legislators will want to know more about the specific situation, and This may lead to the overall defense posture in the ability to take responsibility in the discussion. “(Compiled: Spring)