Military of China, force comment.
Military of China, force comment.

2010 United States Department of Defense,” China-related military and security Development Report “cover

BEIJING, Aug. 19 (Xinhua) The United States recently in a series of actions Yin Zhengyi Southeast Asia, and China, the U.S. military on China’s military reaction to the report, cause Hong Kong and Taiwan and foreign Chinese press attention, analysts believe that China’s response to gentle than last year, the recent U.S. military exercises is not to be enlarged processing, reserve space for the future; the U.S. media that the exercise confrontation, the wave of tension always in the past, to find the exit mechanism to be reconciled, China and the U.S. did not provoke a war in space, the world will not allow this.

Hong Kong, “Wen Wei Po,” 19 published reports that the outside world noticed, March 26, 2009, Chinese Defense Ministry spokesman Hu Changming 2009 China had the U.S. military comment on the report, said: “China expresses strong dissatisfaction and resolute opposition. “and there is no response Geng Yansheng,” strong dissatisfaction. ” Military analysts, this year’s report, or with more moderate tone, not as aggressive about.

“Ta Kung Pao,” citing Beijing’s point of view of military experts LiuJiangPing means that China’s military development is to meet to safeguard national sovereignty and territory, airspace, territorial waters of the “bottom line” demand, and never seek to “cap”, also never take the initiative, not to participate and not to initiate an arms race. China’s military development is reasonable and appropriate. Some countries harbor suspicions of China’s military development and even hostility, in the final analysis is still biased to China.

He stressed that each country has its own security situation, the surrounding circumstances and any State under the threat of its own security upgrade weapons and equipment is an objective law. For China’s national economic development, normal development, to safeguard their own security interests to purchase the appropriate weapons and equipment, said China launched an arms race, is unfair and not objective.

and the newspaper published an article “containment strategy against the U.S. economic penetration.” The article says the United States to take vertical and horizontal strategy is clearly evident in the recent period to strengthen the political and economic containment against China, especially military containment. From the national interests of the competition and non-cooperative game perspective, the United States is a clever use of the truth has yet to clear international events successfully disrupted the pace of economic cooperation in East Asia. In the not calm the Nansha Islands and Southeast Asia, the United States followed suit. China’s future must be highly alert to international capital and their advocates, economic and strategic penetration of containment.

Taiwan, “Central News Agency” reports that the South Korean Defense Ministry said South Korea in September to hold joint anti-submarine exercises in the Yellow Sea. United States immediately confirm this, and said that China should not be regarded as the US-ROK joint military exercises recent security threats. The exercise is expected to anger China. Any military exercises held in the Yellow Sea to participate if the United States, become sensitive issues.

“China Times” entitled “Beijing low-key reserve space for the US-China relations,” the analysis said that, the U.S. military announced the mainland, “China’s military power” to respond to the report. Observers pointed to respond to gentle than last year, not the United States at the recent series of military exercises in China, together with enlarged peripheral processing, reserve space for the future.

United States, “World News” is published in 18 local editorial that, in any case challenge, confrontation exercise outside, this wave of tension always in the past, we must find the exit mechanism, “reconciled good “, because the United States there is simply no space to provoke war, the local wars and conflicts, while the world will not allow to do so, after all, the big trade-led diplomacy and the new global order still did not come to an end.