Military of China, force comment.
Military of China, force comment.

U.S. Newspaper carrier attacked screen

special correspondent in the U.S. newspaper correspondent Xie Zhao Zhe Ho

U.S. that China is trying to implement “anti-intervention” strategy for the United States is a challenge in the Western Pacific , while the U.S. was unable to cope with existing capacity. The Pentagon last year specifically for this proposed “sea-air joint operations concept.” But the U.S. military how to apply this new future will be the guiding ideology to fight, but little is known about the outside world. EADS France 19 website disclosure, the United States Strategic and Budgetary Assessments has released the latest report describes in detail the United States, “the joint sea-air” against China’s tactics.

from the “strategic threat to China’s anti-intervention”

U.S. Strategic and Budgetary Assessments is an independent policy institute, the main decision-makers to the major issues provide “timely, fair and depth” analysis. The report said the United States to maintain the vast geographical placement and the ability to maintain military strength is critical. The Soviet Union during the Cold War the U.S. power projection has posed a serious threat, but the decade after the Cold War the U.S. military force projection capabilities has not been any challenge. But now the U.S. military interests in key regions – Western Pacific theater mission capabilities, the PLA is being seriously challenged.

report said the Chinese army is committed to the development of “anti-intervention/regional” denial capability. The report lists China’s anti-important means of intervention strategies, including “wind” anti-ship missiles with a range from a few hundred kilometers to 2800 km range, “the East China Sea -10″ cruise missile threat to the radius of one thousand meters up to 1800 , and JH -7 firing C-803 anti-ship missile attack range close to 2000 km. The report said, China relies on missiles and aircraft in the “anti” forces combat radius covers the Strait of Malacca, near Guam. This will force the U.S. Navy had 2700 kilometers away from mainland China regional activities, while the U.S. is difficult to deal with China’s existing capacity of this “anti-intervention” strategy. Leaving the U.S. concern is that this “anti-intervention” strategy is being more and more national attention. In February, the center of a separate report, also rely on explicitly mentioned Iran and missile boats similar “anti-intervention” strategy.

The report concluded that there is no indication that China will change in the second island chain outside of the establishment of “no-go zone” efforts, the future of U.S. military operations in the Western Pacific region will rapidly increase the cost and risk, and faster than expected. The new U.S. proposal of “sea-air joint concept of operations” is specifically used to offset the PLA’s “anti-access capabilities.”

fully elaborate how to deal with People’s Liberation Army

the United States’ sea-air joint operations “did not long. In September 2009 the U.S. Navy CNO Roughead, respectively, and the Air Force chief of staff, General Schwartz signed an order, send two services form a joint group to study the concept of sea-air joint operations. This concept is similar to the early 1980s, the United States to air joint operations, it is then in a few local wars in the successful application to astound the world. As the sea-air joint operations are highly sensitive project, and is currently still in its infancy, few outsiders get the message. The Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessment report is by far the most detailed one, it clearly describes how the U.S. will display their “sea-air joint operations.”

report mentions the concept of sea-air joint operations must be given priority for the Western Pacific Theater, “high-end military action.” Report that the initial phase of the U.S. and allied forces and bases are bound to bear the People’s Liberation Army’s precision strike; but the U.S. military must be completed for the People’s Liberation Army battlefield networks blinding operations, the PLA long-range intelligence, reconnaissance, surveillance and attack system suppression, and maintain in the sky, sea, space and cyberspace control.

To achieve this goal, the implementation of sea-air joint operations to the Air Force and Navy theater in the Western Pacific to maintain strengths. As the main U.S. military base in the Western Pacific region are likely to attack, so the U.S. Air Force long-range strike to play the main advantages: space, the PLA Air Force is responsible for blinding ocean surveillance satellite, to stop anti-ship ballistic missiles, the PLA Navy ship high-value target ; Air Force long-range precision strike force may destroy long-range maritime patrol aircraft and the PLA long-range ballistic missile launchers, the U.S. Navy to extend the active area, reducing the base of the United States and its allies suffered a blow to stealth bombers, supported by the offensive anti-submarine warfare mine. The Air Force open channel, the U.S. Navy ships and aircraft are at or near the high-intensity attack and reconnaissance: Aegis warships to the forefront of the Air Force to provide anti-missile defense, ballistic missile raid PLA block; submarines and carrier-based reconnaissance support for the U.S. Air Force long-range strike, paralyzing the PLA, manned and unmanned reconnaissance platforms and space-based fighters, refueling and other support to U.S. Air Force aircraft to move freely. Report that, through such joint action, would defeat most of the PLA military action.

U.S. experts questioned the

Although the U.S. air and sea to make the U.S. military joint operations concept sounds more powerful, but there are not experts in the United States completely agree. United States, “Defense News” quoted U.S. strategic analysts in April, retired naval officer Brian ? McGrath’s viewpoint, the U.S. military services over-emphasis on multi-joint, actually reduces the ability of the U.S. Navy’s sea. He believes that ultimately the United States can not focus to deal with potential competitors, in particular, it is difficult to continue the suppression of opponents such as the Chinese navy. He suggested that in the future should increase investment in the Navy. Brian McGrath said, “Although the multi-service combination is recognized the world to improve military point of view, but will indulge in multi-service joint military intelligence and strategic thinking to become an obstacle.” In his view, the need for cooperation and support ground forces, U.S. Navy under the current environment, not to the Pentagon and Congress to vigorously promote the development of sea power. He stressed: “China’s military buildup can make the most appropriate response is based on the sea, the development of maritime strength of the military strategy.” ▲