Military of China, force comment.
Military of China, force comment.

data Figure: U.S. Navy aircraft carrier battle groups

“International Herald Tribune” article area around China’s bursts of thunder and the United States on “The New York Times” Previous involving “East Turkistan” reported “silent floor”, the two seemingly distant a sign, but seems to notice the move into the United States is “post-terror era.”

Norwegian police arrested several attempts to attack Western targets, “East Turkistan” elements, “New York Times” surprised, called “East Turkistan” elements actually “with their own purposes (to split Xinjiang from China) mm unrelated to the attacks in Western countries, “and acknowledged” the existence of a radical organization of East Turkistan separatists ‘Turkestan Islamic Party’, which the Chinese government has always insisted on saying the same. ” Although these words sound almost an afterthought in our to the point of talking, but finally have is a kind of progress, showing that “the international community has accepted China’s position:” East Turkistan separatists “have been seen as isolated molecules is stabilize the situation as a threat. ”

However, we can conclude that “to accept the Chinese position,” the Western world will henceforth give serious consideration to fight terrorism together with China, no longer playing, “One person’s terrorist is another man’s freedom Warriors’ set of tricks it? Since the “9.11″ Sino-US anti-terrorism cooperation since it can be effectively strengthened, at least to break through the thunder and little rain is not the long-term dilemma? Can we look forward to even optimistic about China-US anti-terrorism cooperation between the two countries will resolve or at least ease the increasingly sharp differences in safety? Or, as some of our people have advocated, as Sino-US consensus in the fight against terrorism and cooperation on bilateral security dialogue and build mutual trust? Specifically, with the West in exchange for including anti-terrorism maritime security, including security and mutual trust?

Objectively speaking, these expectations into reality the possibility of much less than the octopus Paul guessed the probability of football results.

U.S. media, “” China’s position not mean to be “accepted” the idea will become the basis of U.S. government policy. Recognize the “East Turkistan Islamic Party” is a terrorist organization and to recognize the “East Turkistan Independence Movement” and “reasonableness” in the U.S. view is not contradictory, they can still support the Taliban in Afghanistan, while capturing the “East Turkistan” elements, while leaving the “East Turkistan” elements in Capitol Hill that side blue rag shaking, as they have done before as.

media level or whether the United States government level agree that China is also facing terrorist threats and the United States to support China’s fight against terrorism is simply different from children, not to mention a counter-terrorism cooperation with China. Year in the United States has seized the help of the Central Asian countries the “East Turkistan” forces attacked the U.S. diplomatic plan, so what? Did not affect the United States refused to “East Turkistan” elements transferred to the third country to support them.

further inference, even if the United States in the consensus on the issue of terrorism has increased, whether this improvement is the performance of China’s bid to the United States issued a statement condemning the “East Turkistan” separatist forces in Xinjiang plot, according to the U.S. or China requirements for Zhu’a U.S. military support for diplomatic and military significance, the safety of the two countries will not “dialogue” have a wonderful impact on the atmosphere. Because the dream from the war on terrorism in the wake of the United States, to answer this question who is the ally against terrorism has been far less than the military judge who is the new rival to be more critical and urgent.

“new Afghanistan” strategy, the United States extricate itself from the terror on the battlefield mentality become apparent, not only because of “terrorism” has nothing to fear more the more expensive anti-good accounting, but also because in the past decade United States engaged in “terrorism”, when some in the mid-1990s or even the United States has long been identified as a strategic adversary’s national power has been a significant recovery or growth, such as Russia and China, which has led to a strong U.S. concerns.

“9.11″ after a long period of time, “Sino-US cooperation against terrorism” even more of a representation rather than real, but that “terrorism” has become America’s primary strategic needs, the objective Sino-US relations to provide a certain “strategic opportunity”, U.S. policy toward China for more from the “containment” to “contact.”

Today, the U.S. has basically decided to withdraw from Afghanistan strategy, at the same time, Obama came to power, quietly gave up the same time defeat two enemies and enemies of the regime transformation of one of the strategic nature of the arrogant, has strengthened the new military construction, to ensure that the U.S. military technological revolution in the new process in an absolutely dominant position. To prevent the rise of the emerging military power, for the United States, than catch bin Laden much more important.

might argue that, at least for the moment the United States, the defeat of “terrorist threat” and to ensure that the same conventional military supremacy is the key, at least in the United States is so expressed. Maybe, but it can not ensure that U.S. relations with China in the context of thinking about these two issues simultaneously.

at least temporarily in the United States policy toward China was behind the scenes “to prevent the rise of strategic competitors” considerations, has walked onto the stage. Recently both the “2010 Pacific Rim exercise” swagger or whether the U.S. aircraft carrier participating in the Yellow Sea, ponder over and over again on the issue, are just the future of Sino-US relationship is the touchstone of evolution. After the era of terrorism, to ensure that the U.S. Navy in the Pacific waters of absolute advantage, to prevent the rise of an emerging military power will become the core of U.S. policy toward one of the factors, the right to contest the sea and safety issues or about Sino-US relations will be the principal contradiction. [Author] Ye Hailin

“International Herald Tribune” Legal Notice: newspaper reporter and freelance writer authorized newspaper declared: newspaper laid down in the written manuscript and provided pictures, not The newspaper permission reproduced excerpts (reproduced in need, please call to 010-63073377 or email ihl-market@vip.sina.com “> ihl-market@vip.sina . com )