Major General: Diaoyu Islands is related to the great cause of reunification grassless can not lose
the Diaoyu Islands islands
Japan unwilling to succumb to China under the “emotional outpouring
Liu Gang (Okinawa, Japan University): Diaoyu Islands issue is very difficult for China. First, it actual control by the Japanese, followed by Japanese society, there is little “dead end” feeling, not to say that Japan should fall, but the Japanese nation, “Island radicular strong, do not want to be subservient to China in East Asia under This is a problem since the Meiji Restoration. But, in fact, the Japanese economy has been dropped after China, the Japanese were very reluctant. They eventually found the Diaoyu Islands issue. They hype the issue of the Diaoyu Islands issue is not just the waters, or resources. For the right-wing, they want to reverse the direction of Japan’s political and state guidelines. Obviously, the Diaoyu Islands speculation has a shadow in Akira, is Japan’s rightist nationalism in the float to the surface. Japanese people go very fast in this direction, the emotional outpouring was very full.
essentially a contest between China and the United States
Peng Guangqian (China Policy Science Research Council National Security Policy Committee, Deputy Secretary-General, Major General): We want to thinking about a problem: how to recognize the issue of the Diaoyu Islands? Diaoyu Islands issue is not the general historical issues, nor is the general problem of territorial sovereignty and maritime rights disputes, it has a deeper or more comprehensive strategic connotation, strategic bottom line is we dominated. At least three questions to discuss with you.
first, why it is not a general issue of sovereignty? Diaoyu Islands issue is the maintenance of the fruits of victory in World War II with a negative problem. How to deal with the fruits of victory in World War II, the United States played a bad role. The U.S. had secret dealings over the Diaoyu Islands to Japan, leaving the bane of today. In this issue, the United States and Japan have common interests. In this issue, we have to fight for international justice, not just our territorial sovereignty.
Diaoyu Islands issue is essentially a contest between China and the United States. Diaoyu Islands issue highlights the very important background is the U.S. military’s strategic center of gravity eastward shift. Ishihara also see climate. American of strategy eastward shift of Japan, they find an opportunity or patron. The United States is also pleased to Japan put out to contain China, as a pawn of the eastward shift of. Diaoyu Islands issue is tempted.
third, the Diaoyu Islands, the jurisdiction in Taiwan, the Diaoyu Islands issue is part of the problem in Taiwan, the Diaoyu Islands issue is not resolved, the Taiwan issue can not be the ultimate solution, it is unified with China’s reunification and the great cause of national rejuvenation linked it is not a long grass, even if one is not long grass, we can not be lost.
Li Jie (Chinese naval researcher at the Institute, Colonel): The essence of the Diaoyu Islands issue, the United States wanted to use Japan to contain China, but also want to take advantage of China to contain Japan. The overall strategy of the United States in the Asia-Pacific region is the US-Japan teamed rope surrounding a small country, to disrupt the marine situation, to contain China. It is trying to all countries mobilized to contain each other, no peace throughout the Western Pacific. Clear understanding of the substance of the Diaoyu Islands issue, China and the United States is very important. I am afraid that the final solution is the need for the two sides to sit down and talk.
defend the Diaoyu Islands is to maintain the Yalta system
Li Wei (China Academy of Social Sciences, director of the Institute of Japanese Studies): Japan is unwilling to talk to us other When it comes to the nature of the Diaoyu Islands, Japan stressed is a question of law, with particular emphasis in the official public occasions. We say that it is not only a legal problem, or that it can not be purely from a legal point of view to explain the problem, it is a historical problem, to rely on evidence to solve. But the Japanese are very afraid of the evidence can be seen in their official combing or some retired officials wrote papers on the territory of the island dispute, they are very afraid to talk about this historical problem, they require the legal resolution, and they that the international law to support the effectiveness of disposable.
propaganda we should pay attention, this is not a purely legal issue. Japan steal the Diaoyu Islands in January 1895, and it has been before this peep years, been afraid hands. Why to January 1895 before hands, it is because of the Sino-Japanese War of China’s defeat. Taiwan returned to China in the abolition of the Treaty of Shimonoseki, the Diaoyu Islands can not return it? Justified. So we want to emphasize that this is in the Sino-Japanese War of period, in the region of the same war, with a predatory war, it is the same overall behavior is indivisible, must With the Treaty of Shimonoseki “restitution China. Where is the origin of the Diaoyu Islands issue? Legal issues? History, is caused by the war.
we would also like to stress that the the Japanese defeated processing international political document that does not support Japan’s claim of sovereignty over the Diaoyu Islands, which made it very fully. Next year is the 70th anniversary of the “Cairo Declaration” signed, we should take advantage of this opportunity. We would like to reiterate the results of the world anti-fascist war, post-war legacy issues to deal with from this height, including the Diaoyu Islands. We can refer to the Declaration of a lot of things, even when occupied by the United States to Japan, published in January 1946, some documents, have proved that the Diaoyu Islands is not Japan.
on the problems of the world anti-fascist war, with the United States as the victors in a front, the United States on the Diaoyu Islands issue is not to choose sides had a problem in the open international meeting should pull over. The United States is now repeated statements to the US-Japan Security Treaty applies to the Diaoyu Islands, we can say that this is their bilateral treaties should not apply to a third country, which is prejudicial to the outcome of the World Anti-Fascist War. We wrote books to show that the judgment of the Diaoyu Islands issue judgments on historical issues and the world anti-fascist war, rose to this height more conducive for us to strive for more international support.
Japanese media said the Tokyo Metropolitan Government intends Gordon the Diaoyu Islands
comment said on August 29 the United States in the Diaoyu Islands to the front on the issue to pressure China
before senior officials: date is subject to change by the Diaoyu Islands policy to listen to Chinese views
Japanese media disclosed “seize the Diaoyu Islands” combat: if necessary, the U.S. military war
Japanese officials said the US-Japan military exercise imaginary offensive in China to seize the Diaoyu Islands