To compare the strength of expert: F -20 and T-50 required to service
Date:2012-08-14Author:adminCategory:China militaryComment:0
PRC Beijing August 13 call (Reporter the Huang Zaijuan, Linan Nan) to celebrate the Russian Air Force’s 100th anniversary, the T-50 fifth generation fighter in the public eye again, cause great concern to many users take the T-50 and China’s J-20 fighter when it comes to the difference between these two fighters, Colonel Du Wenlong, researcher of the Academy of Military Sciences, said in an interview with People’s Daily reporter, J-20 and T-50 the two fighters are not in service, to judge our current T-50 and J-20 Who is stronger who is weak, based on inadequate and not sufficient. Until the service time for mass production, the basic indicators of the J-20 and T-50 characteristics, level of ability to do a basic analysis and comparison. Duwen Long said, the Russian T-50 and our J-20 fighters are in flight test development of the Five Dynasties machine point of view from passages two fighters belong to the same generation, from the technical reserves, Russia may be more, because the Five Dynasties Machine is not a thing today, he is starting service from the Su-27, like the Su-37, MiG -144 are made before the T-50 to explore. Russia in the Five Dynasties and machine time, put more energy than the J-20, relatively abundant experience. In addition, the Russian aviation industrial base is very good, there may be stronger than we have strength in some aspect of system design. J-20 as China’s first Five Dynasties machine, in fact aimed at 4S standard, the other in the design process will certainly take into account the U.S. F-22, F-35 fighter mention must also be put against the F-22 F-35 as their primary goal. If you take to follow the development in the future confrontation may also be a disadvantage. So I think there should be convergence on the T-50 and J-20 development path. The most common is the F-22 as the main goal of the confrontation. So whether it is in its ability to stealth, mobility, accumulation of ammunition, fire control system design should be the F-22 as a basic combat object or target. Du Wenlong analysis from the F-22, J-20, T-50 three fighter-driven layout point of view have their own advantages: the stealth ability, T-50 and F-22 shape , and a lot of technology for the first time use, these are its unique. J-20 in these areas a number of innovations adopted a canard, the whole dynamic of the vertical tail. In general, the vertical tail can not be full-motion, can only be individual mobile control surfaces. In order to improve mobility, the entire vertical tail can be full-motion. Then this whole move is to improve the aerial agility and ability to maneuver. when it comes to T-50 and J-20 is stronger contrast, Du Wenlong said, I think J-20 and T-50 basic point of view or from the capacity point of view, now is not good to discrimination, because the two fighters are not in service. The final flight test a lot of improvements. We now see T-50 and J-20 and the service when compared to lead to great changes, so today we to judge the T-50 and J-20 Who is stronger who is weak, and now is based on insufficient and inadequate the. In addition, from the current test status to see the conclusion is not accurate. So until that time service, mass production, we can J-20 and T-50 characteristics, the level of basic indicators of the ability to do a basic analysis and comparison. relevant reports: Russian media said China’s aviation industry to develop the F-20 F-15 far more than Japan Russia said F – 20 to replace the Su-27/30 is expected to equipment 500 -made F-20 heavy stealth fighter offensive and defensive long-range strike British media said China’s aviation engine is far behind do not have to overestimate the F – 20 share to:
F-20 fighter/span>
Random article
Related Articles
No comment yet!