Private education experts condemned the blatant whitewashing Japan’s aggression against China by
Shan Ren Ping: beautification of the Japanese invasion of China should pay the price
roundup of the [Global Times] Guangdong private education experts, Baiyun District of Guangzhou City CPPCC members credibility built on the 24th of this month issued microblogging, public beautification of the puppet Manchukuo, Manchukuo and said “the heroic army is working with the friendly with the liberation of Nanjing”, he as a public figure, openly said that the Japanese invading army “friendly”, said the Japanese barbaric act of the Nanjing Massacre as “the liberation of Nanjing” It is shocking.
should be noted that, even if the Japanese right-wing, a little social status did not dare to so beautify Japanese invasion of China up to argue the number of victims in the Nanjing Massacre, and then questioned the Nanjing Massacre exist.
credibility built of speech is not worth refuting the need to explore why he dare so lightly collision Chinese society value the bottom line, take China’s most suffering part of the history baited, beautify stained with China The blood of the people that supported brutal foreign enemies. Perhaps when he issued this microblogging Internet environment of public opinion will allow him to do so, perhaps he is also looking forward to appreciate, he obviously does not believe that they will say these words to pay the price.
opinion field is some confusion in recent years, the understanding of history is the hardest hit. Challenge the mainstream view of history abound, from the beautification of the late Qing Dynasty to the beautification of the Republic, was developed to want to reverse the verdict for the puppet Manchukuo.
country’s mainstream view of history, often has the participation of mainstream values. Many countries have an important historical conclusion given the mandatory legal protection. Such as Germany for the Nazis is prohibited to reverse the verdict, in almost all countries of the world are not publicly praised France. In Japan today can not openly praise the “731″, can not praise the knives to injure head competition of the Japanese soldiers in China.
credibility built hair piece microblogging openly kicked in the evaluation of the history of the Chinese people value the bottom line, become the most outrageous of the present extreme views on social tolerance offended and test. If the Chinese society is this tolerated credibility built remarks, are dwarfed any other radical rhetoric, the Chinese public opinion field will be the values ??of the binding completely zero Adventure.
should be built credibility erroneous statements and resolutely fight back, and this process as a mainstream values ??the prestige. Credibility built just deleting that microblogging is not enough, he must make a public apology to the nation the public. In addition, he needed to pay other consideration as a public figure.remarks before
letter Lijian demonstrate the ideological and political extremism, and this time he made the microblogging just the tendency of the outstanding performance. His remarks show that he can not afford to participate in politics, teaching and educating social responsibility, and do not have the ability to fulfill its current role in society.
We call on the Baiyun District, Guangzhou CPPCC credibility built expelled from the institution in accordance with the law, Baiyun District, Guangzhou CPPCC responsible for local government affairs and respect for the national feelings of the people should do. The Xinli built in his state of mind, should stay away from any level of the political arena.
credibility was built in civic education should be limited, for the credibility to build educational entities participated in the founding, the authorities need to ensure that his extreme ideas do not penetrate into the teaching process, not students and teachers to spread. He should not be encouraged to expand investment in education.
we do with these calls is not advocated “freedom of speech to incriminate these claims are nothing to do with the Code, but to protect the important public safety of the environment, to avoid them by extreme ideological source against.
We are firmly opposed to a public figure of speech “zone” argument. In fact, the problem of the credibility built remarks by no means the freedom of speech involved, he was trying to destroy the Chinese people since September 18, 1931, has never wavered is non-standard and value judgment.
credibility built to reflect on their own with the society, time, efforts to remedy the historical view. ▲ (The writer is a commentator of the “Global Times”)
copyright works without the “Global Times” written authorization is forbidden and offenders will be held liable.share: