Military of China, force comment.
Military of China, force comment.

data for: the fifth-generation fighter of the Chinese R & D demonstrator F -20.

China can successfully rise? If you do not continue to rise, the Chinese have a retreat?

the international political moment and the next few decades, the fundamental problems in China’s internal mentioned less and less, the Chinese people’s interest in quickly returned to the political realities around the various details. Requires a high degree of solidarity in response to external pressure, the country has exposed the internal conflicts of interest that has historically been very familiar with the social, ideological debate fiercer than ever.

Chinese focus on domestic people’s livelihood, as well as the rapid development of social diversity, making it the same radical rising powers do not seem the same. China’s foreign policy is very cautious, to avoid the adventure and expansion, the Chinese army has been more than 30 years and have not played a decent war, Germany and Japan and the Soviet Union’s ambitions for regional and even global bones.

Chinese domestic public opinion has begun to affect the formulation of foreign policy, foreign policy no matter which direction to develop public opinion split is getting higher and higher, will be met with some criticism of public opinion and the clamp. This makes it an extreme foreign policy dominated the Chinese the possibility of getting smaller and smaller.

but all things are the pros and cons. Extreme help to avoid the big national tragedy, but the weakening of internal cohesion, but also make external suppression of China’s relatively easier. As China is gradually firmly secured in position second in the world “and more” Vision “, we are still difficult to predict the pressure is likely to gradually upon us.

China’s internal self-criticism compared with the history, rising powers have been not less than that. Some critics accused the national political mess, questioning the rationality of military spending. High-speed rail and other leading technologies are critical to the competitiveness of large state-owned enterprises continue to experience a scandal in the world. On the attitude of Libya, Syria, the voice of the anti-official policy, public opinion is quite prominent.

the U.S. Congress the trouble of manufacturing to China in the past seems to be the largest Chinese domestic criticism a little better than the external light, and two voices in many cases have the intersection point.

These undoubtedly help to strengthen the supervision of the Chinese government, China’s cautious on the world stage almost have a “double insurance”. But the problem is, this may cause to be unreasonably suppress fear too much, can not plunge.

China so far to resolve most of the conflicts of interest with the outside, but then China can continue to avoid the possibility of external sharp conflict is small. If the Chinese patience mainly domestic public opinion will not agree. Tough on domestic public opinion to clamp down just as great.

do not have a voice can public opinion in China’s high degree of unity, but the image of China’s Soviet-style authoritarian state. Criticism of Chinese politics is the main direction of the external and domestic critics of this high degree of identity. In order to make this criticism more effectively, patriotism has also been some people as a target of attack of public opinion.

We often say that China’s reform and is now entering a Sham Shui Po District. In fact, in the international arena, the rise of China has entered the deep water. The two deep-water areas must be taken into account, they are the future of relations with the Chinese people. We can not just focus on one of them.

not from the difficulty compared two Sham Shui Po District, but there is a difference is obvious. The first deep-water area is a tangle between the Chinese people, Chinese people overall control. And the second in Sham Shui Po, the Chinese people there is no dominance, we can only hope that their own strength and will.

Chinese took to the rise of the road in case of loss of internal cohesion. The historical implications of the internal changes, we are not very clear. China has indeed had a human history of the river by feeling the stones. Experience to follow the case, the entire nation awake is crucial. Like “reform” retreat, we also did not “rise” retreat. Need to move to the other side. ▲

share: