Military of China, force comment.
Military of China, force comment.

Data for: being allowed to enter the U.S. naval base in Yokosuka, USS Washington.

Singapore’s “Lianhe Zaobao” 12 published scholar Xue Stanford University, said Thailand’s article, USA Today, again with no financial resources of regional nuclear powers such as China’s long-term military confrontation, not to mention the two nuclear head-on collision of a large country. America’s objective is not the money, not on the subjective will of such a showdown. The U.S. confrontation with China’s strategic goal is still the “defense” rather than “anti”, “without splitting” of the situation can still be sustained.

article excerpts are as follows:

According to foreign media to determine, from a global military posture and focus on the Asia-Pacific region, Iran and China has been the United States as a war to win a major operational target .

1 5 March, U.S. President Barack Obama and Secretary of Defense Panetta, accompanied by Joint Chiefs Chairman Dempsey, held a press conference at the Pentagon, released a report entitled “Maintaining U.S. global leadership: the 21st century defense priorities, “the new military strategy report. Obama stressed in his speech, although the United States face budget pressures, will continue to strive to ensure that the advantages of its military superpower status, while the U.S. military will shift the focus of the Asia-Pacific region.

Obama also said, after a decade of war, the U.S. military is in a transitional period, it is necessary to adjust its focus will be to downsize, streamline the troops, “but the world must know, the United States will maintain its powerful armed forces military advantage “, and flexible, ready to respond to various emergencies and threats. He claimed that the U.S. military will shift the focus of the Asia-Pacific region.

current Washington faced with unprecedented pressure of tight budgets, the U.S. military withdrawal from Iraq following the withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan after being. In Iraq, Afghanistan wars to a close, Washington, the U.S. military overseas to re-evaluate the role is inevitable. It is in this new military strategy in the context of the introduction of.

Obama administration is proposing a substantial reduction in the budget plan, including cuts in the next 10 years, defense spending reached $ 450 billion. Sharp drop in defense spending since the U.S. decision, and adjust the size of the army and the armed services, a substantial structure, the military is bound to develop new strategies to adapt to the changing international political situation and military posture, so the new military strategy came into being. In the new military strategy under the guidance of Washington before the work to proceed in an orderly manner.

some of the new military strategy for interpretation, there are three metaphors: one is the size of the U.S. Army will be reduced, will continue to reduce the number of ground troops, have to increase the navy and air force input in the building, emphasis on key areas to ensure that the global air and sea; Second, Europe has no longer become the focus of U.S. strategy, the United States will continue to reduce military forces in Europe; Third, the United States will prevent future similar to Afghanistan and Iraq launched two long duration the war.

two new military strategic points

another two cases, the finishing touch is the new military strategy of the Department:

First, the new military strategy shows that in the future the U.S. will continue to be of limited military resources transferred to the Asia-Pacific region in favor of strengthening the U.S. military presence in the Asia Pacific region, the Asia-Pacific region to maintain the “security and prosperity.” U.S. military will focus on the oil-rich Persian Gulf region from turning the Asia-Pacific region, and the expansion of military power in the Asia Pacific region as a top priority agenda. In other words, this means that, although the U.S. military on a global scale will continue to streamline the troops, but, in the Asia Pacific region, if necessary, U.S. military forces will be increased rather than decreased; in the Persian Gulf, the Navy is to maintain a strong enough military carry on.

Second, the future is the only U.S. goal to win a major war, while the U.S. military should have the ability to respond to any enemy invade the second intention. Past U.S. strategic goal is to fight two major wars, and now reduced to a war, reflecting the Pentagon showing the current U.S. national stage debilitating conditions to realize.

Today, the United States is still deeply in debt crisis, the economy could struggle, many U.S. and trapped in the war in Afghanistan, and Iran’s nuclear crisis is imminent, showing the potential delay. American Eagle now need healing, to recover. Both need to heal, “the contraction front” is the question of the proper meaning, which will win the two wars by the strategic goal to win a war, is in line with the logic of strategic thinking.

According to foreign media to determine, from a global military posture and focus on the Asia-Pacific region, Iran and China has been the United States as a war to win a major operational target. Introduction of new U.S. military strategy, it may mean that the U.S. military in the Asia Pacific region to increase investment in the move, has moved from strategic planning to strategy implementation phase.

Obama’s speech, the main U.S. allies in the Asia Pacific region to keep up with Japan soon. “Yomiuri Shimbun” in the editorial pointed out: the new U.S. military strategy look allies to play a role. Japan must make a contribution on the defensive. The past ten years, Japan has to reduce the defense budget. Japan “must interrupt this reduction approach to the re-armament as priorities.”

the occasion of the rise of China, the United States are stepping up efforts to curb. This need not none the less horror. After the world into the nuclear age, has a long-range nuclear missiles in the two respective countries, the war never broke out before, even large-scale border conflict had happened. This new pattern of nuclear powers to get along, but also to the strategic posture of confrontation between two strong continued deterioration of the introduction of a new powerful constraints.

United States to use extra leverage, Geshandaniu means to contain China’s rise. Since 2010, the “day” warship was sunk and other international conflicts in Korea and Japan have strengthened relations with the United States allies. I believe that the United States may also have a strategic plan. What, then, why the U.S. nuclear power in the region with Chinese decorum it?

sum up, in fact, Beijing is no need for the new U.S. military strategy is too tight, Sino-American relationship is still changing, but also to continue to observe. As for paranoia, panic, then no need of.

USA Today, again with no financial resources of regional nuclear powers such as China, the long-term military confrontation, not to mention the head-on collision of two nuclear powers. America’s objective is not the money, not on the subjective will of such a battle, even wishes of decorum. The U.S. confrontation with China’s strategic goal is still the “defense” rather than “anti.” Although the “anti” and “anti” is not an insurmountable between the high wall cutting deep, but “without splitting” of the situation can still be sustained. (Xue Thailand: International Security and Cooperation at Stanford University Fellow at the Center)

. OtherContent_01 p {line-height: 23px; margin: 0px;} . Icon_sina ,. icon_msn,. icon_fx {background-position: 2px-1px}. icon_msn {background-position:-25px-1px;}. icon_fx {background-position:-240px-50px;} share :