Commented that the so-called “military arts beauty” is not a military department malicious speculation
online” military arts beauty “image up to more than 342,000 sheets ” military arts beauty “form online crowd
Chinese military networks, Beijing, December 31 – Ben Wang reporter reports: time to multi-group known as the “military arts beauty” name a bold out-of-photo pictures and related video network burst red, triggering hot, resulting in the military, the military image of the damage. Military Art (PLA Art Academy for short) this response: the so-called “military arts beauty” is not a soldier, with its “military arts school beauty,” the name of the individual packaging, speculation, should immediately stop and correct, eliminate, the record straight.
correspondent search found online “military arts beauty” of the relevant information up to 1450 thousand months. In the major online forums, QQ and many group blog, in addition to boldly affixed a bit of the unusual “military arts beauty” of the various postures of the various types of clothing, a variety of styling Videos of, photo, there are a few Zhang is very eye-catching “‘uniform’ photos’, these photos and video in the” uniform “or the” uniform “image, some old (has been suspended for the allotment, wear) of the cadet equipment; some new clothes cadet or officer, However, obvious errors or discrepancies logo wear, and many sites in the reproduced these photos, mostly in the “eclectic steal the spotlight” “spurting sexy”, “large-scale photo” “China’s first Breast” “swimsuit burst milk,” “nude shoot” and other hot spicy, exciting statement labeled title. In various forums, message, in addition to some of that wonder, the envy of the statement, the most “very yellow, very violent.”
“‘uniform’ photos’, ” photo ‘photos’ release and the related video together, burst transmission network, so that many users believe that the photographer should be” military “,” military arts beauty “of the title and title to a certain extent, and guide, adding to the users of the “military arts school beauty” and “military status” identity, which, in online forums, QQ group, blog on the message thread “very yellow, very violent” language, both in its objective seriously damaged the image of the military and the military.
Recently, the military arts reporter to interview teachers and students of the respondents, “the military arts beauty” phenomenon are difficult to accept, for which the military and caused serious damage to the image of the armed forces expressed strong dissatisfaction with and indignation. Calls upon the parties and stakeholders to immediately stop and correct as a “military arts beauty” in the name of the individual packaging and hype, the record straight, to eliminate the impact.
Military Training Department Zhang Tingting Arts Minister told reporters that the so-called “military arts beauty” military arts Daipei students who have no military status. With special emphasis on the military arts has never been called “the military arts beauty” related activities, individual entertainers to the so-called “military arts beauty” in the name of the individual packaging, speculation, is the image of the damage to the military arts, but also the military and damage the image of the armed forces. Zhang Minister spoke of the military arts to develop artistic talents as a military only art school, the students have a high entry requirements, the training of performing arts professionals not only have good quality arts, but also have the unique charm of the military temperament. The so-called “military arts beauty” walk in the military and the artist’s “gray area”, only to mislead the audience, but also to deceive the audience. News media should not its packaging, fueled speculation, the majority of the audience should consciously resist the vulgar, vulgar, kitsch style, advocating a scientific, civilized, healthy, compliance Deschamps U.S. culture.
According to the “military arts beauty” of the armed services, military clothing and accessories sign photos, the reporter interviewed the relevant units of the departments concerned, the results show that the “military arts beauty” is not the bills or special arrangements discharged from active service records.
not tarnish the image of the armed forces
Ben Wang commentator
As a non-military personnel, in uniform, wearing the right branches of non-symbolic, self-proclaimed “military arts beauty” film, released a bit bold, “photo” and the video. This disregard of social impact, with a clear business purpose and personal utilitarian packaging, speculation, greatly damaged the image of the soldier and the army.
military uniform is different from other social groups, an important symbol, is an important symbol of national prestige and military might; “military art” is the military establishment of formal institutions in the sequence is an important component of the military as a whole. “Military uniforms, according to” and “military arts beauty” dual “military status” as to mislead, deceive the audience and confuse the special “carrier.”
in the context of network communication with the fast development in the context from the media, copy the information super-extended super-distance transmission, super-super-limit the scope of coverage and impact as possible. Users of the “military arts beauty” “very yellow, very violent” sort of negative comments, it is easy to become damaged the image of the military special “public opinion”, is hugely magnified.
audience feel a steelyard. If you ask the soldiers, the army is valid and the image of people’s minds will inevitably flashed Lei Feng, Yang, Li Zhonghua, He Xiang United States, Wu Meng Chaodeng heroes and models, and rivers flood, the Wenchuan earthquake relief, such as the 2008 Beijing Olympic security forces typical groups. The image of both the military and the military is the abstract concrete. Represents the image of both the military image of the individual soldier, but also tend to affect the overall image or on behalf of the army. Damage the image of the individual soldiers, often resulting in damage to the overall image of the armed forces. The so-called “military arts beauty” to the military image of the packaging, speculation, resulting in damage to the image of the military while the military is bound to harm the image.
People’s Army is a strong pillar of the people’s democratic dictatorship, is the great wall of steel to defend the motherland. Military image should not be joking, military image should not be tarnished. Maintain the image of the military and the military, not just soldiers and military bounden duty of every member of society is the basic ethical requirements. No one should shame to the soldiers, throwing dirt to the image of the armed forces.share: