Overall U.S. strategy toward China is to build a containment system
affect current and future changes in the international strategic situation for a period of three things: First, the United States and European sovereign debt crisis as the representative of ongoing global financial crisis, and thus lead to social crisis, crisis of values; two WANA is a sweeping historical and political upheaval; Third, the U.S. global strategic center of gravity eastward, is the U.S. global strategic focus to the Asian region. The first big crisis, and second great upheaval, the three big shift, respectively, in the economic sphere, political and military fields. Is characterized by three-dimensional turbulence, the global linkage, continuous fermentation, Prospects, showing the international pattern transition, typical of the transition period.
This is 2011, a significant impact on the international strategic pattern of three major events, while the three major events but also with China’s national security, national survival and development are closely related. I would like to focus on the “center of gravity eastward U.S. global strategy” to talk about their personal views.
eastward shift the focus of U.S. global strategy has been basically put in place
a geophysicist once told me, the whole earth there are two seismic zone, one circum-Pacific seismic belt. Another is the Eurasian seismic zone. These two seismic zone two basic strategies on behalf of the United States, the United States do a similar seismic zone in Europe and Asia, and now got circum-Pacific seismic brought.
U.S. global strategic center of gravity eastward, since the end of the Cold War, the international strategic pattern of significant contemporary impact of the serious situation, but also the post-Cold War security environment facing China is indeed the most severe challenges. The so-called impact of the international situation: that is reshaping the international system, and split the international community, disrupt international order. U.S. experts with the words: The United States has sounded a new Cold War Chong Fenghao the 21st century, opened a prelude to a new Cold War. Bard College Professor Mead said the United States, the United States tried to “kill the myth of the rise of China in the cradle.” Japanese politicians use the words of the United States “to build a fence on China package is already shot gun bullets.”
implementation, a disintegration of the Soviet Union, America’s global strategic center of gravity eastward began. At least after the end of the war in Kosovo began. By now it should be said that the transfer has been basically put in place, of course, is not fully in place.
eastward shift the focus of U.S. global strategy consists of four aspects, namely the U.S. strategic center of gravity eastward containment; the second is the strategic focus of attention eastward; Third, focus resources on the center of gravity eastward; four is the strategic center of gravity eastward.
six aspects of the United States from China’s strategy to build containment system for
focus of U.S. global strategy eastward is not a one-track mind problem, in fact, the United States is to build a comprehensive overall strategy or a system. U.S. efforts to build the opponent’s strategy to contain China as the system, mainly in six areas:
first, with China as the main operational target, west of the Pacific as the main battlefield in order to Air Navy as the main combat forces, “Air Sea Battle” campaign operation system. During the Cold War, the United States and the Soviet Union in the European theater ready to fight a “ground war”, the United States that is now unlikely that the battle has been a; future wars will be mainly in the western Pacific and China to fight a “empty war.” American original words to say: “The air and maritime war” aimed primarily at changing China’s anti-intervention and Regional Denial operations, if the U.S. does not wish nor the ability to implement large-scale land war in China, then west Navy’s Pacific theater will be empty theater-led air and sea. Also said that in the western Pacific to the United States influence and power projection pose a serious challenge to the country is China. The Battle operational concept was first commissioned by the U.S. Department of Defense to engage in a think tank, has now been formally adopted by the U.S. Department of Defense, a national military policy, and it was set up in the Department of Defense, “Air Sea Battle,” office, which during the Soviet period are not before. “Air Sea Battle,” office in the end want to do? This is a very serious note of the situation.
second to Japan and Australia as the fulcrum of two strategic north-south military alliance system. North of Japan, south Australia, North and South of China, to suppress. United States not only to the US-Japan, US-ROK alliance to engage with, to achieve integration of United States, Japan, with the building, including India, Vietnam, the Philippines, including the “small Asian NATO.” Americans have always stressed the alliance strategy of war, not alone. Since the Gulf War have sought to put together a multinational force. Now it is to do is to make the organization to prepare for future operations.
third, west of the Pacific island chain as the basis of the military base system. Security environment in Australia and the United States has not changed, not a major security threat facing the reality of the case, eager troops in Darwin, and why? Is coming fast before the South China Sea. U.S. bases in the western Pacific by the three-wire system largely composed of five groups, three lines of the West Pacific, the first, second and third island chain, the five subunits in the Northeast is the base group, group of Guam, Hawaii based group, Australia and New Zealand base group, Alaska base group of five base group, 60% of U.S. nuclear submarines, 11 nuclear-powered carrier to be deployed in six here.
fourth to Western values ??as the core of political infiltration system. Including the use of Internet and other new means of communication, to promote Western values, to cultivate the agent in China. Huntsman public speech, as claimed, to recruit 80 people in China, toppled China.
fifth, exclusion and repression in China, established to curb U.S. economic dominance in the economic system. The United States actively create “Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership Agreement” (TPP), the intention is clear, is to exclude the Chinese, to regain the initiative in the Asian economy.
the sixth to drive a wedge and sow discord between China friendly relations with neighboring countries, characterized by the so-called “forward deployment diplomacy” system.
these trends show that the problem? At the outset that the depth of China-US structural contradictions, not a person can be changed, whether it is Bush, Bush or Obama, are the same, no big difference; Secondly, that the fundamental interests of U.S. hegemony, that the United States maintain the hegemony of the determination and energy. We should not be underestimated; third is the performance of China’s national security environment is indeed very serious and must not be taken lightly.
Yaesu factors eastward shift in U.S. global strategy
focus eastward on U.S. global strategy What will our national security as much harm? Or the United States can not wish fulfilled it? Now we can not simply draw conclusions, but also to look at. Unexpected outbreak. U.S. wants to do something, is one thing; can not do as it is another matter. The current U.S. global strategy into more and more difficulties to face many constraints, which in order to focus, concentrate resources, to me, there would be a bit difficult.
First, expanding the influence of Iran, the U.S. has become a scourge. U.S. attack in war year after year, the biggest beneficiary is Iran. Iran’s growing and expanding, to removal of the nail, easier said than done. In Syria, Iran before the overthrow, the United States probably focus more easily elsewhere without hands.
Second, Putin’s return to challenge the United States of nerves. Putin and President Medvedev “the Mouth”, and turn back. United States is unwilling to accept this fact. Normally, in order to ease US-Russian relations, Putin said the U.S. should point to good things, but the face of “Return of the King,” the harsh reality, the United States despair, himself, “yells,” which is bound to further intensify US-Russia conflict. Putin’s return to the United States, although that does not mean an absolute confrontation, but at least the U.S. will increase a lot of trouble.
three in South Asia, Pakistan and the cooling of relations with the U.S., the growing rift. Loss of the effective cooperation of Pakistan, the U.S. anti-terrorist operations in Afghanistan will be more difficult, but also to penetrate the United States of South Asia frustration.
Fourth, the threat of terrorism remains. The ? Bin Laden is dead, but terrorism remains a major threat to the United States, terrorism was increasingly localized, network, and the United States and not a high pillow to sleep.
five U.S. financial crisis is not three day or two can come out. U.S. financial crisis is not an ordinary Toutongnaore, but a large area of ??myocardial infarction, the political system and economic system is a problem. Insatiable rentier class, lawlessness, loss of control of U.S. dollars, living beyond, unlimited overdraft lifestyle emptied the United States. No money, doing things that are powerless.
six sow discord in the United States in Southeast Asia may not be successful. Southeast Asia and China share a common historical memory, the traditional friendship, a few subversive, then you can sow discord. The last American to Asia, to Southeast Asia is to remove the money, then people after him. It is everywhere for money, so people do not like to go along with it hard to say. Indeed, it was playing double-dealing tactics, like the introduction of the United States to balance China, but that is a few countries, but also to the thugs who act as the United States, and China rivalry in their fundamental interests.
seven events in West Asia North Africa, contrary to the wishes of the United States is moving in the direction of development. “Jasmine Revolution” is the result of the US-backed dictator was overthrown, the United States in West Asia, North Africa, “the pile foot” to go down one by one. Comprehensive regeneration of the Muslim forces, the “Arab Spring” is becoming America’s “Arabian winter.” Many feelings and blood and tears into the United States, the Greater Middle East project painstakingly undone face the danger.
Finally, the most important point is that Chinese people have stood up, China’s slaughter is no longer possible. Today, no one can bully China without any penalty. No one can go to eat Chinese. Hitler’s globe can hold hands, but no one can cling to one-fifth of total human population of the Chinese society. China to eat, swallow does not survive, even if swallowed, it can not digest. Like Princess Iron Fan, like the Monkey eat, stomach pain is.
understanding of Sino-US relations, there are two errors
of course, the face of U.S. global strategic eastward, as we do not have to panic, not apathetic. Have a clear understanding of the situation. Currently the strategic basis for coping with complicated situations, including outside the home. As long as we treat our own affairs well, and politically developed, up and down the unity of one mind, there is no one can topple us. If their political security, economic security, cultural security failed, others do not hit you, you would collapse. So the most important thing is to own a good job.
There is a saying that China and the U.S. have become increasingly interdependent, the United States does not like how the Chinese. The dual nature of Sino-US interdependence in itself, if we both do not know, then no contradiction, as the relationship deeper, more contradictions. War Ye Hao, Ye Hao World War II, some degree of dependence on trade between nations go to war is not worse than it is today, there is dependence does not mean you can resolve all the contradictions and risks, this is a misunderstanding. Especially in the economic crisis conditions, the manufacturing history of the military crisis is passed the crisis in some countries the usual means.
There is a saying that: “Sino-US relations good or where to go, not much that bad”, the judge generally consistent with the facts in the past of. But in the United States to China as a major rival, the nature of things began to change. There is always some politicians want to pressure change, so that the disintegration of China itself. If we deal with missing data, there civil strife, does not rule out someone collaborated with internal and external attack, the possibility of dismembering China. This must not be taken lightly, self-paralysis.