Experts said the South China Sea nine intermittent line into line with the Convention on Law of the Sea
information Figure: China’s South China Sea into
The Voice of China “News” reported that in the eve of the US-Philippine joint military exercises, the Philippine presidential spokesman Chen Xianda interview visit, said the South China Sea have disputed islands, China’s position has always been hope shelving disputes and seeking common development.
“9 条 intermittent line” as the two sides’ dispute “Focus
Philippines that joint development is not a problem, but they claimed that China sovereignty over the South China Sea in violation of international maritime conventions law, which was unacceptable to the Philippines.
Chen Xianda: China’s position is “9 intermittent line” division (the South China Sea), but in terms of “nine intermittent line” division, in violation of United Nations Law of the Sea Convention. According to the Convention, each country two hundred sea miles exclusive economic zone have sovereignty. We (the Philippines) to know which belongs to us, which is controversial. On the disputed areas, we are willing to peaceful settlement, it has been our position.
I did not violate the South China Sea territorial waters designated United Nations Convention on Law of the Sea
but military experts, Rear Admiral Yin Cho that spans 2,000 years of history to prove China has a preemptive right for the Spratly Islands, and the “nine intermittent line” as delineated on the history of Chinese territorial waters boundary, is recognized by the international community, China for the delineation of the South China Sea territorial waters, there is no violation of the UN Law of the Sea Convention.
Yin Cho: “9 intermittent line” is historically produced a line, after the 1911 Revolution, there was a love for China China’s propaganda vast Chinese territory, our marine resources and maritime territory, so we have a boom This is the first invented by the intellectuals as a way to mark the intermittent line, after the ROC government has adopted a “intermittent line,” the official expression, then the Philippines, where the Philippines is not independent yet.
the ROC government in 1947 announced to the world, are published by default or the world we all recognize this idea, they say with the United Nations Convention on Law of the Sea, but just in the United Nations Convention on Law of the Sea 10 , Article 15, Article 74, Section 83, Article 298, the five head we can clearly see the historic rights of clearly defined, if rights have priority over other historic all right, of course We are also in line with China in line with international law, the United Nations Convention on Law of the Sea, the Philippines, this sophistry is so totally not stand feet.