Western media have ridiculed the Russian weapons inflatable model (Figure)
Date:2011-08-29Author:adminCategory:International militaryComment:0
Russia disguised weapons Photos
Global Network reporter Liang Xu reported that the British “Daily Mail” reported that Russia will only verbal boasts its own military strength, in fact, whether the fighter or missile launchers, tanks or aircraft are used inflatable model instead.
Russian media quoted on July 21 reported that the British newspaper article as “the strength of the Russian army’s rubber” named and dispensed a lot of Russian weapons and camouflage photos. The article said that the inflatable is hard not to laugh out loud models, such as inflatable tanks that before “hanging on the nose” down on the ground, like a shrunken elephant. Reading between the lines reveals the mood of schadenfreude, that do not have to worry about a new world war will happen, because “the worship of the Red Army as the rubber material, its latest weapons are inflatable products.” Article questioned whether the Russian use of these weapons because of inflation can fool the distant foreign satellites.
British article said that the Russian response to the economic crisis will be replaced with a cheap inflatable weapons, real weapons. These “phantom” weapons of its density and rapid deployment capabilities will continue to be used.
but the Russian media of the “pneumatic weapon” has a different understanding of Russian military experts believe can develop “disguised weapons,” because its benefits are: military training can be effective; can camouflage techniques to maximize Although modern technology can easily identify the metal used in sewing, but to detect what specific model is not easy. But Russian military experts also pointed out that although in times of peace should be armed with a military model, but such a huge number as Russia is inappropriate, the expert said: “The opponents should not be treated as a fool, that never exist.”
. OtherContent_01 p {line-height: 23px; margin: 0px;} (edit: SN038)
No comment yet!