Commented that China should not be for the South Korean warship sank and other events when the referee
Cheonan South Korea on April 24 bow salvage, aft on April 15 salvage.
Liu quality new
President Lee to attend the opening ceremony on the eve of the Shanghai World Expo, Korea, the mainstream media suddenly “one voice” to assume that “day” Mystery ship torpedo explosion caused by the Korean system, and asked the Chinese “justice “Korea for the redress of grievances.
This is the evolution in international relations, China has been asked to play referee in the latest voice. Prior to the Korean nuclear issue, Iran nuclear issue and earlier issues unrest in Nigeria’s Delta region, some countries and organizations competing demands or “encourage” China to play a responsible role of the referee.
China’s economic triumph, GDP ranks among the global top three, put on a “world factory” and “world market” of the title, the World Bank the right to vote jumped from sixth to third. China’s international influence along with significantly enhanced. But the Chinese really can play the role of international relations and the referee do?
which is obviously too early.
China are suffering their own traditional security threats, the consequences of whistle there is a huge uncertainty. To “Taiwan independence”, “Tibetan separatist,” “East Turkistan separatists,” as the representative of the ethnic separatism to linger, because the courage to provide a hotbed of the objective existence of international anti-China forces. And China’s biggest security threat comes from the United States. Because the United States has both the ability and motivation. In global trade routes, China leads the world’s capital channel, the most powerful movement of people and goods. But China’s military power projection capability is extremely weak long-range, and no foreign military bases, military trade route running ability to secure complete control of the first in the world, the U.S. military bases all over the world. While China’s energy consumption ranks second in the world, although smaller than the U.S., but the latter is actually the world’s energy supply market control people. Moreover, domestic law above international law and uphold the tradition of the United States’ Taiwan Relations Act “has been a lit fuse of the United States and potentially spark a military conflict.
so deeply rooted in the interests of the United States hot spots, the Chinese once the whistle referee, unless the care of U.S. interests, see the U.S. tune, otherwise, they have braved the United States into the opposite risk. No matter what kind of situation, China’s interests will be compromised. Take South Korea, the recent “security” as an example, when the U.S. set the tone, “there should be a new war could lead to miscarriage of justice”, the Chinese ask how much “justice” of the room?
even in blind spots or weak areas of U.S. interests, the opposing sides is not likely to abide by Chinese impartial adjudication. Because China lacks the reality of the results will judge the political, economic and military means. And in theory, may not exist in today’s world, U.S. interests in the blind spot areas.
some countries and organizations require or “encourage” China to play a responsible role of the referee, in itself does not seem fair. South Korean media to seek China’s “justice”, the order may affect “the next 100 years of Korea-China relations,” threatening; Iran with vested interests in Iran to China to put pressure on China. Perhaps their intent is to let China join the cheerleaders. But have to admit, this is a true reflection of the international political reality in the foreseeable future will be repeated. Chinese people to rationally face, not enraged.
For China, the cool look of its own power, put an end to restlessness, making new friends less enemies. Indeed, improving the safety factor of overseas interests to achieve the lifting of the arms embargo on Europe to promote the World Trade Organization member states recognize China’s market economy status, which is the pursuit of China’s current diplomacy. (The writer is media people in Jiangxi.)
(“Global Times” May 11, 2010 14th Edition)
“Global Times” of copyright works, is not The written authorization is forbidden and offenders will be held liable.