Japanese experts in the U.S. inability to challenge the military’s doorstep
data for: U.S. Navy aircraft carrier George Washington is receiving supplies.
data for: the South China Sea exercises, 052C type 171 ship launched anti-aircraft missiles.
data for: the South China Sea exercises, 054A 570 ship-launched anti-ship missile type. 052C-ship together with the composition of the Chinese navy’s air defense network layer.
latest issue of Japan’s “Chinese Herald” published by the JCC New Japan Research Institute, Chang Gung Yan, deputy article “South American action is not so big threat.” The article said that China and the United States recently passed a series of actions, whether the strategic ideas? Is that the United States is prepared to China’s “showdown”, “Sword”? The answer seems to be negative. These actions will not change the basic trend of the future United States and East Asia, and even the pace of development may not be affected.
article excerpts are as follows:
recently by the United States, “Clinton declared the U.S. Interests”, “joint military exercises in Vietnam,” “involved in the South China Sea disputes,” and other actions , continuous in the South China Sea to China show strong ties to the military exercises with South Korea in the Yellow Sea, described as “menacing.” These U.S. actions are strategic ideas? Is that the United States is prepared to China’s “showdown”, “Sword”? The answer seems to be no.
U.S. action there is nothing new
U.S. encirclement around China to build the so-called “first island chain” to the “second island chain”, has still remains. U.S. military activities in the South China Sea and other Chinese coastal waters is not started today. Slightly compare, you can know the recent U.S. actions are mostly “old tricks” and nothing new.
involves China’s sovereignty and core interests from the perspective of “Taiwan Relations Act” includes a few years ago with Japan, “something around” bill at the time were some groundbreaking moves. Today the U.S. action did not reach that level, which has not broke through the last frame. While the U.S. government with some new vocabulary, but it has not built a new policy, but it did not fully subvert the courage and strength of the Sino-US relations.
8 20, Japan’s “Yomiuri Shimbun” reported that three messages: First, the United States sent aircraft carriers into the Yellow Sea to give up, accused of taking into account China’s attitude; Second US-Japan “won the island exercise” Taiwan immediately expressed concern about the visible differences in the interests of all parties; third down in Vietnam more military exercises with the United States reacted coolly. These are the release of negative information to the United States, that the United States to intervene in the South China Sea, China must face the attitude differences between the interests of all parties, and parties to the trade-off choices. These are not the United States a few little tricks can be nothing new about.
seen recent U.S. actions do not have much new meaning, does not change America and East Asia, the basic trend of the future, and even the development of rhythm is not likely to be affected. U.S. policy did not invent anything new “magic bullet”, just from the past in a big kind of direct “intervention” into indirect, sow discord of “destruction”, a bit like the guerrillas threw to both sides of the enemy camp of the “grenade” lead to “autocorrelation conflict” means.
the U.S. military’s inability to challenge China
U.S. policy toward China are nothing new, there is a reason. Of course the most fundamental changes in power relations. Let us see whether the economic strength of both sides one after another, unable to talk about the international environment such as growth and decline on the conservative tide. They said just give a hot topic recently: “China’s second”, it illustrates the strength of the real potential of the American mind.
balance in East Asia, China and the U.S. is the overall strength of China and the U.S., the front set and the institutional environment of competition and other factors work together to co-ordinate down to form a strategic balance. This situation will undoubtedly become increasingly favorable to China is conducive to peaceful development is conducive to stability in East Asia, including the American people but also conducive to peace-loving feelings. Therefore, the United States than in China is strong, but the U.S. military’s inability to really challenge the Chinese, especially in countries in the door, even more so.