Experts say the West set the trap drive a wedge between China and India incite public opinion battle
Data for: Indian soldiers patrol the border areas
“there is neither the Chinese threat to India, there was no threat to India to China.” 1982 China National leader Deng Xiaoping met with Indian guests, made the evaluation of the Sino-Indian relations. As the two neighbors of rising power, has two years of traditional friendship between China and India should become a pair of hand-prosperity and good partners. However, in recent years, the pursuit of win-win cooperation process between the two countries was the noise from the media and civil hands were tied.
pursuit of commercial interests, some of the Indian media to hype the “China threat”, “Sino-Indian confrontation” as the increase sales and click-through rate of the magic. These real to the enemy’s sensational news after some Chinese media and re-processing of secondary spread, potentially deepen the misunderstanding between the two peoples to each other. Experts pointed out that the media represent the voice of the government’s decision-making. China should calmly deal with the speculation in the Indian media, or vulnerable to giving others a handle, so hiding behind the Western powers to find the opportunity to drive a wedge between China and India.
print media to start another involving Huafeng Bo
8 27, “Indian Express”, “The Times of India” and a number of mainstream media coverage of India said that India “Jammu and Kashmir,” the top military commander, Lieutenant Justin Walter planned in August to between India and China to participate in a high-level exchanges, but China believes that the sovereignty of Kashmir dispute, so Justin Wall refused to issue visas. Soon this message derived from the another more explosive news — the Indian government will “break the military exchange” means “retaliation China.” “The Hindu” quoted an unnamed Indian official as saying that China and India’s future military exchanges between the military and joint military exercises have been suspended until the Chinese to solve this problem until after the recovery.
Indian media seize this link, or even no reason to be India’s Human Resource Development Minister Kapil Sibal’s visit to China with the normal “break-India military exchanges,” together. According to reports, Sibal’s visit to China will be held on September 10, during which will participate in 13 to 15 September in Tianjin at the Summer Davos forum. Indian media have said Sibal’s visit to China trip as “ice-melting trip”, this visit might “break the ice between India’s defense exchanges.”
only two days, the Indian media in turn began to hype the border issue. “India Times” reported on August 29, the Chinese government seized on July 12, the Shanghai World Expo India, the museum’s brochure with a map of India. In this map, the “Arunachal Pradesh” (southern Tibet and China — Editor’s Note) is marked as Indian territory. The newspaper analysis, the Chinese government to do so is due to some experts and users of the tremendous pressure.
9 January, more than the latest issue of the Indian media reported that the Indian government has begun to consider how to “counter” China’s policy on the territorial issue. The recently held meeting of Cabinet Committee on Security in India reached a consensus that India will be ‘tough stance against the “Chinese, especially those related to Indian territorial sovereignty.
do not follow the printing press “Brew”
“China and India on the border issue does still exist some controversy, so a sign of trouble, it is Indian media is easy to arouse nationalist sentiments. “India, China Institute of Contemporary International Relations expert Hu Shisheng on” World News “the reporter said. Hu Shisheng that the Indian media has been done before things get a precedent that the border issue, and some may be true, while others are purely random fabrication. “Indian media commercialism color is very strong, almost all major anti-China media coverage to attract attention, a business means competition for the audience, which is inherent in India’s media environment, media, sound does not mean that the Government’s position, so we do not need rivalry with them. “
media fan the flames, while in India, and Indian governments in a timely manner out of the fire. China and India are the first Department of Defense denied the “Sino-Indian defense exchanges interrupt” stories. For India, the Chinese government confiscated the Expo Hall brochure news, Indian Foreign Ministry spokesman said, “(China) does not interfere with the functioning of the Indian Museum.”
Hu Shisheng said this year is the 60th anniversary of Sino-Indian diplomatic relations, bilateral relations between the two governments want to be on a higher level, so try to avoid bilateral relations because of the media to incite and hurt. “As the Government have a correct understanding of the prospects for Sino-Indian relations, so no matter how the media see those, nor will derail Sino-Indian relations.”
Hu Shisheng stressed that India launched an attack to the Chinese media focused on the case last year, there have been. September 2009, some Indian media to the so-called “China’s military invasion of the Ladakh region of India,” ground first, the collective issued a malicious anti-China reports triggered a media war between China and India. Some Chinese media and Internet users began to attack India. “In fact, the so-called ‘China’s military invasion’ is entirely concocted out of the story but we got used to the Indian media seems to hype these things, so naturally it as a reason to counter India.”
Hu Shisheng added that, in dealing with India, China, Chinese media reports, you need to keep their eyes open, to distinguish the authenticity of the message, and should more actively communicate with experts and scholars, with a rational and objective tone to the report, rather than mere spur of the moment along with Indian media ‘squalling. ” “Vicious competition in the media between the two countries may be misleading the public, and public opinion will kidnap the government, making the two governments efforts to promote bilateral relations more and more conservative.”
drive a wedge between the West and India set set relations
Experts believe that India will not only struggling with the overall destruction of the cooperation between the two countries, but also so keen on pleasing the Western forces hiding behind succeed. Sometimes, the Western media deliberately spread the news in India is not and, in order to stir up public opinion battle between the two countries. Western China must not fall into the trap set by public opinion.
most reluctant to see the United States and India together are good at playing this game. United States, “New York Times” article published in late August, reported China to Pakistan-controlled Kashmir, Gilgit region more than 10,000 troops stationed in order to “ensure that the influence in the region.” Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Jiang Yu and Pakistan Ambassador to China Masood Khan denied the relevant report. Masood Khan said that no Chinese troops in the region, only a Chinese rescue team is experienced in helping flood victims.
addition to the provocation by the sensitive issue of Sino-Indian border, the U.S. media often focus on military movements in India, an attempt to create “an enemy of India,” the illusion. U.S. foreign policy website on July 6 issued a document in response to rising Chinese military power, India’s Cabinet Committee on Security has launched a secret program in support of the Indian Army, Navy, Air Force expanded combat force. Under the plan, India is the formation of two new mountain divisions, plans to deploy in the northeastern Indian border. At the same time, the Indian Navy is working to build and access a variety of powerful new platform.
Hu Shisheng told reporters that the United States as the representative of Western countries often look upon the vicious competition, the rise of India and deliberately expanded the potential competition between the two countries. The latest issue of British “Economist” magazine’s cover story took on a look at the Sino-Indian relations that have sufficient manpower is not a fantasy India than China. United States, “Wall Street Journal” article in October last year — “against India in the 21st century intensified” — cited China and India in trade, financial investment, aerospace engineering and other fields of competition exists, the last was the unwarranted conclusion: the tension between the two countries will intensify.
“West of the Sino-Indian relations to a divide and rule, restrict them strategy. This is a manifestation of their loss, because the development model of China and India closer together if so, will the impact of the West economy in the world dominance. “Hu Shisheng said. He further pointed out that the West is now overtly or covertly pursuing a “help China and India suppression” policy. They found that India is “the greatest democracy,” while China is undemocratic. India, Western media often use “strong potential” to cover up the “China model” of glory.
should be separate from the official printed media
in India some of the experts pointed out that the vicious competition will only intensify their strategic consumption, if After the two sides can play their respective advantages and complement each other, will have a “1 +1> 2″ effect.
Indian Minister of Commerce, the famous economist 贾伊拉姆拉 Meche has invented “in India” (Chindia) word, that “world factory” and the “world office” should strengthen cooperation build a new international economic order to make their own contribution. East Asian Research Center, University of Delhi, India, Sri chakra Mattie Professor Barry has pointed out in an article “: India’s development model is a complementary, rather than against each other in the infrastructure construction, manufacturing, etc., India China as a teacher should be to turn, in the financial system management, intellectual property protection and other ‘soft environment’, India also has the advantage of China can learn from. “
India China Institute of Contemporary International Relations expert Hu Shisheng on the “News of the World,” told reporters that a healthy public opinion for China and India has a very important role. The current two most important thing is to enhance mutual trust and reduce suspicion. This requires two media on public opinion correctly guide public opinion. Nationalist sentiments in both countries there are, like some Chinese media quoted the Indian media unthinkingly China-related reports, sometimes adding emotional things, even the media’s remarks “transfer” to the Indian government.
Hu Shisheng that the Indian English media representatives and reflects the views of the Indian strategic elite, does not mean that the Indian government’s China policy. “Chinese media and Internet users will never be the Indian media by the nose, should be more positive direction from a review of bilateral relations. For example, more than China and India have in common in common with the West, the rise of India is one of China kinds of strategic buffer, etc.. “(Source: International Online -” News of the World “)