Military of China, force comment.
Military of China, force comment.

data for: Song Xiaojun

Russia’s First Deputy Prime Minister Igor Shuvalov visited today, there is a dispute between Russia and Japan of the South Kuril Islands, which is called the four northern islands of Japan. According to reports, Shuvalov is the life of the President’s visit to the island country after a number of construction projects in progress. Just nine days ago, Japanese Foreign Minister Maehara just overlooking the disputed islands from the air, Russian Deputy Prime Minister of the landing behavior of what kind of subtext? Japan will be no further response? CCTV “Global vision” December 13, 2010 broadcast, “the Russian official release of the disputed islands, then climb any information? “The following is the complete sets of the:

Moderator labor Chunyan:

Good evening, welcome to the news channel is being broadcast” global vision “, I LO Chun-yan.

studio today is a special invited commentator Mr. Yin Zhuo, and Mr. Song Xiaojun, welcome two.

would like to ask about the two experts, this time out of Russia’s reaction is what purpose? Is not for nine days before the Japanese Foreign Minister Maehara’s overlooking behavior?

News: Following the Russian Deputy Prime Minister after the board president disputed islands

Song Xiaojun Commentator:

I think that far Vision is not the most important for the behavior, or the United States and Japan focused on the Noto Peninsula in the vicinity of the anti-missile exercises. In fact, in 2005, when China and Russia both have published a joint statement against the anti-missile weapons to deploy around. This time, the United States and Japan through the Korean Peninsula crisis, the Noto Peninsula in the vicinity of anti-missile training, in fact, supposedly a threat to Russia’s interests, Russia has been very polite to do so. Russia’s Southern Kuril Islands, the four northern islands or inside the Sea of ??Okhotsk, the Russian ballistic missile submarine launch site, it can actually hit the U.S. in two directions: one along the north line of this trajectory to hit the United States, crossed Alaska; one is the trajectory down, very fast, is to use ballistic pressure is relatively low, faster, can be worn anti-missile system, reach the United States through California in this direction. Russia on the ABM issue that is now on whether Putin, as well as some Russian military officials in both parties on further reduction of strategic nuclear missile treaty the above problems, the issue of missile defense have shown a tough stance I think mainly for this US-Japan missile defense exercise.

labor Chunyan:

Japan and there will be some what kind of response? Mr. Yin, your analysis.

Yin Zhuote some commentators:

I think Japan will certainly be a very strong reaction, because the so-called four northern or southern Kuril Islands, Japan’s dream to break the pattern of a major World War II breaking point, and in 1956, has been a breakthrough when, with the return of two islands. From the perspective of international law, it has exceeded the time requirements of Japan’s unconditional surrender, while the United States, Britain, the Soviet Union, and the results of the consultation, when World War II, when the requirement is to be submitted to the South Kuril Islands, Russia hand, Russia can use force to recover to recover later as the territory of Russia always has.

Japan wants to overturn the Second World War such a pattern, that is, as a normal great power, breaking the click where? A course on the Diaoyu Islands, the Diaoyu Islands is such a situation; second is the South Kuril Islands, it wants the South Kuril Islands as a breakthrough. Now Russia Biaochu tough stance, it is this place run into a wall.

labor Chunyan:

Japanese Prime Minister Naoto Kan of the people I am afraid this is a diplomatic problem.

recent situation in Northeast Asia is very busy, let’s concern about the situation in the Korean peninsula. Yin Ping Island shelling has in the past 20 days, but Northeast Asia is still the guns boom, especially in the United States, Japan vigorously engage in military exercises one after another, after South Korea today began a five-day fire training at sea, and claims to be and U.S. discuss North Korean nuclear attack if you stand with nuclear weapons on the back of this plan in place. The other side of the Sea of ??Japan, with Japan also plans to deploy Patriot anti-aircraft missiles throughout, to defend against ballistic missile threat, North Korea is what kind of attitude? U.S. pressing harder and harder to face South Korea and Japan, North Korea’s official media claimed today, “US-ROK cooperation may lead to nuclear war peninsula, North Korea will be forced to strengthen its nuclear deterrence, is reported after the first hit, but also a nuclear counterattack, is the “Patriot” missiles, feel the peninsula confrontations have so far not a simple artillery fire, nuclear cloud hanging over the peninsula seems, we also a short video clip to find out the latest News.

Commentary:

According to South Korean media reports, South Korean Joint Chiefs of Staff on December 13 to 17 during the Korean peninsula and the Korean Peninsula and the eastern waters of the western waters of 27 places at sea firing exercises of which the western waters of drill sites to the highest of 15, while the eastern waters of the drill sites have Ulleungdo offshore, land south-east of the island, Geoje Island, Jeju Island, south-east and east, etc. It is worth mentioning that Earlier concern paekyong and taeyonpyong not included in this exercise in shooting since the Korean peninsula last month, the exchange of fire occurred taeyonpyong since South Korea has held several rounds of military exercises, the peninsula also will dramatically escalated. frequent for the South Korean military exercises, December 11 North Korea South Korea North Korea Peace advocacy organizations support National Ethnic Commission spokesman said in response to the situation in North Korea has already done to meet the full-scale war preparations.

today, and the other A message has attracted wide attention, according to Yonhap, Han Meian 27th Security Policy Initiative meeting will be held at 13 in the Department of Defense, according to reports, South Korean Defense Policy Office Director Chang a and the U.S. Department of Defense for East Asian Assistant Minister of regional affairs Xue Mai Long will lead a delegation to attend the meeting on behalf of the two countries.

Korea in the meeting reiterated that if North Korea launched a similar taeyonpyong again shelling militant provocation, Korea will As the Allies to be strong and decisive counter-attack, and discuss the concrete implementation of the measures required to deal with the principles of addition, the two sides will also discuss the response to North Korea’s nuclear weapons, the threat of weapons of mass destruction non-proliferation policy committee formed to implement the transfer of operational command 2015 right strategic alliance plans to redeploy U.S. troops and other matters.

In addition, according to South Korean KBS television news, No. 12, South Korean National Assembly Defense Committee chairman, said Yuan Yu Zhe, Korea and the U.S. are discussing if North Korea going nuclear attack, to respond immediately to counter nuclear program. reported that Yuan Yu Zhe also stressed that South Korean troops ready in time to intercept North Korean long-range artillery of the signal, the response of long-range artillery preparation has been reached can trust level, but according to the recently completed North-South Korean Defense Ministry unconventional warfare capability status report, Han Jun is only the size of more than 20,000 special forces, more than 20 million people in North Korea, South Korea has more than 50 seats missile launchers, North Korea is estimated that 150 seat more than 1,000 missile launchers and missiles, not nuclear and biochemical weapons, South Korea, North Korea with 30-40 kilograms of plutonium can produce 5-8 nuclear warheads, also has 2500-5000 tons of chemical weapons can be used as chemical agents .

are comments: posture laid out the U.S. to curb North Korea South Korea and Japan have their own thinking

labor Chunyan:

now being discussed for the Korea-US This system of nuclear response to nuclear program, North Korea has a new position, there is a North Korean Rodong Sinmun commentary accusing South Korea and the U.S. conspired to pressure, but the article also said that the cooperation between the U.S. and South Korea will only aggravate the tense situation on the peninsula, and may even lead to nuclear war. Mr. Sung, Korea is now being discussed to see how this response plan, including North Korea such a reaction?

Song Xiaojun:

I think this is actually South Korean officials began two days ago to discuss this issue, is not necessary to re-deploy U.S. tactical nuclear weapons to South Korea’s territory, because the situation in the entire Korean peninsula is the case, is equal to that from conventional military in terms of the military demarcation line north of the Korean side about the United States last year, according to a report Sharp, commander in Korea, about 1,300 artillery pieces aimed at Seoul, a range of 40,50,60 These km covered the entire area to Seoul coverage in this case, if North Korea South Korea hopes to combat with conventional forces is not enough, have to use tactical nuclear weapons.

history of the United States starting from January 1958 to deploy the Korean Peninsula nuclear weapons, including 280 and 203 of this nuclear artillery shells, including some to-surface missiles, such as “honest John”, “Matador”, “Redstone”, there are some nuclear mines, and some nuclear bombs, is the plane with the later North Korea in April 1985 after the signing of the NPT, it does not allow IEA go, must be the withdrawal of tactical nuclear weapons in Korea in 1991, when Bush withdrew, so the two sides talked up Clinton was also Yes, to build light-water reactors, etc. South Korea now seems to have to say to the U.S. tactical nuclear weapons, please come back, but I believe South Korea say is their distrust of conventional military power, not confident, but I do not think the United States in this area will agree.

labor Chunyan:

Mr. Yin to see how this problem, there may really be in Korea on the Korean peninsula, in Korea re-deployment of tactical nuclear weapons?

Opinion: North Korea threatened South Korea rendering is to strengthen the ROK-US military alliance

Yin Cho:

this possibility is very small, First, we use from the military point of view, is the real deal on military use, said the U.S. did not need, even if it wants to use nuclear weapons against the DPRK, there is no need to deploy it in South Korea, the deployment in South Korea would be more secure because the launching Whoever does not know when the war opened fire, do not know when the Korean war in the end who first succeeded, If we succeed Korea, and now it’s speed according to the Seoul area, and so the first line of the United States to deploy troops quickly to cover, cover After its nuclear weapons on where you are, it is very unsafe.

so now because in Japan, if reserves of nuclear weapons in Japan, because it is now actually offensive aircraft carriers and nuclear submarines into its Japan, has now been allowed, it does not declare that I am not carrying nuclear weapons to carry, the other for example, “Aegis” ships can launch cruise missiles, and this cruise missile is a cruise missile, the cruise missiles with nuclear warheads can be, cruise missiles with nuclear warheads on land not declared whether they carry, and Japan on this issue now is turn a blind eye. did not need to be deployed in South Korea, South Korea aims to do so rendered the North Korean threat, mainly in order to strengthen the US-Japan alliance, Lee Myung-bak government is very clear strategic objective.

labor Chunyan:

Korea, why do you say, we also see the newly appointed South Korean Defense Minister Kim W town, he participated in the National Assembly hearing meeting, he had mentioned the Department of Defense has just issued a report, unconventional warfare between North and South Korea is the ability to compare and now South Korea has put North Korea’s unconventional warfare capability when the made its biggest threat, we can also a look at the report which revealed that between North and South Korea unconventional warfare capability, including the size of special forces, more than 20,000 South Korea is North Korea more than 20 million people; also with missile launchers, South Korea is more than 50, North Korea is more than 150, including some biological and chemical weapons, etc. to give us his enthusiastic interpretation of what, between North and South Korea unconventional warfare capability gap if the poor really do?

Song Xiaojun:

I think there is some disparity, we know that North Korea really has been studying this unconventional warfare, but this time Kim W town is not completely out of this thing In order to show that the gap between the two sides of this unconventional, but the key is the political environment in Korea, a Korean Grand National Party did not go through, such as South Korea, there are some large companies, including Hyundai and the Democratic opposition, with the United States unilaterally by the US-Korea Free Trade Agreement, in pork, farm produce, etc. in this regard, but added more cars on the United States made a major concession; second, the Grand National Party yesterday forced through the 2011 fiscal year budget, all of these things actually Korea there is a great rebound, how to transfer out of this rally, we should emphasize military power between North and South Korea, the first is the tension and the second is that the gap between military forces, because the Grand National Party, Lee Myung-bak This is where the party wants to increase military spending, end the United States was to buy some weapons, this is their ultimate goal of a.

labor Chunyan:

can say that South Korea’s policy toward the DPRK is now is set type conversion, from security to the positive response, and laid them out to go to curb North Korea’s posture seems to be, what the Japanese have some kind of reaction? We also look through a movie together.

Commentary :

Recently, the US-ROK military exercises have fueled a series of nerve Korea, North Korea conducted a nationwide mobilization to the relevant area fire, the Korean Peninsula become increasingly heated, has been almost to the edge of imminent war. in such critical moment, and take the side of the Korean Peninsula, the Japanese one less speaker, according to Japanese news network reported that Japanese Prime Minister Naoto Kan December 11 in the inspection of an employment center of Tokyo, said the government is considering the outbreak of war on the Korean Peninsula After dispatching the SDF to rescue Japanese nationals Korea.

Naoto Kan, Japanese Prime Minister:

something once on the Korean Peninsula, even if Japan wants to Self-Defense Forces aircraft rescue, can not go, because the Japanese and South Korea has not developed between the relevant rules.

Explanation:

Naoto Kan said later, the Japanese Government is prepared to negotiate with the Korean government, want the Korean peninsula war, to allow self- Guard protection and assistance to enter the South Korean nationals in Japan, this is the end of Japanese colonial rule of Korea for over 60 years, for the first time the prime minister publicly pledged to send troops into the Korean territory, but Naoto Kan’s remarks came out, then met with Japan’s ruthless approved, and in Seoul, Naoto Kan’s remarks did not get a positive response to South Korean Presidential Office responded that the idea is not realistic; Korean military also did not evaluate this expression may be achieved; and even the South Korean government officials said that Korea and Japan in the past Japan to send Self-Defense Forces have never been to the consultation regarding the Korean, Japanese Prime Minister now suddenly sensitive security issues conversations, people could not understand.

Coincidentally, a few days ago, more than Kyodo news agency quoted Japanese government and the SDF official sources said, will be decided by the Cabinet next week, the new National Defense Program Outline of the draft schedule has been introduced in the basic 10, according to this draft, Japan will deploy in the country, “Patriot” anti-aircraft missiles now there are four Japanese Maritime Self Defense Force to intercept ballistic missiles with the capabilities of the “Aegis” ships, and the rest two will be equipped with the skills of the future while strengthening the southwestern islands of Okinawa Prefecture, the military alert the intensity of the MSDF submarines from the 16 to 22 increased the policy has been finalized, in response to North Korea and to contain China as a central theme of access to sea and air self-defense forces have also been clear.

labor Chunyan:

Japan inside the new National Defense Program Outline is possible, because the National Defense Program Outline is not finally introduced, but it is now out of the draft schedule were mentioned, in all of Japan to deploy “Patriot” missile, which is what strategic moves it?

Yin Cho:

If we say it plainly, it is to account to the United States since our last discussion on the talk about the ballistic missile defense, This is a major U.S. industry, it is the MB system with “Sade” and the “Patriot”, “Standard 3″, etc. These are its allies to make money in the world range of misappropriating such an important tool.

labor Chunyan:

tantamount to the United States give an account?

Yin Cho:

pair. For example, Russia, to other countries, including China, including that it may be a strategic trap, but its allies is a means of misappropriating it invented this set of high-cost weapons systems , using the front control in the United States, is to sell you the system, you can not, because you do not have satellite, you can not provide for each other’s ballistic missile launch early warning, early warning by me, by my calculations provided the missiles, targeting me, and then you launch trajectory, you will buy missiles.

labor Chunyan:

is no way for Japan alone defensive role.

Yin Cho:

not alone, it bought more dependent on the U.S. stronger, not just maintenance, that is dependent on the operational use of the United States is growing, because it no front-end and front-end development of the Americans will not allow it. For example, such a large world-wide coverage, covering the whole of Russia, China, North Korea or other relevant countries, including Iran, this place, and ballistic missile launch in Japan will never, as long as no free of U.S. control, it is impossible to establish the system. out of U.S. control, it is not necessary to establish this system, it is to buy so many do, is to account to the United States, I bought the money paid to the United States.

labor Chunyan:

tantamount to consolidate such ties between the United States and links.

Yin Cho:

military alliance relations, but mainly to help the U.S. economy.

labor Chunyan:

“Patriot” missile system such as how the defense forces?

Song Xiaojun:

it is mainly low-level defense, that is tens of kilometers on the defense of such a high degree of fact above, there are other, such as it is now the “Aegis” ships ready to have six, now only changed three new National Defense Program Outline came out the other three should be changed, that is, funding will be down, 6 “Aegis” ships in the middle, of course, Americans want to buy it, “Saad” is theater defense of than the “standard 3″ a little higher, and the rest is jointly developed by the U.S. and Japan are now the “standard 3″ more advanced one, shot high 500 km, is the “standard 3″ of Block2B or both 2A type of bomb, but simply asked the United States hopes Japan to jointly develop, and then hope that the Japanese export, breaking through the three principles of arms exports, but in the new National Defense Program Outline which is not to break the three principles of arms exports, this indicator is also very important, we can only wait and see.

labor Chunyan:

recent trends in Japan point of view in addition to deployment of the “Patriot” missiles, there can be said to be a very big news is that Japanese Prime Minister Naoto Kan declared that “if the Korean peninsula war, Japanese troops would go to aid those of Japanese nationals in Korea.” which South Korea is very strong reaction, even said to be very angry. into some advertising, then we went back chat.

Naoto Kan, Japanese Prime Minister recently said something people are very surprised, then, that the Korean peninsula if war broke out, Japan’s Self-Defense Forces to go to South Korea, aid to the Japanese nationals in South Korea. Mr. Yin to our interpretation of look, Naoto Kan’s argument how do you think?

Yin Cho:

very funny, but I think that Naoto Kan is a response to a lot of Japanese mentality, the mentality is like the West closure vassal state to return to their colony, as long as South Korea was a Japanese colony, to return to South Korea, Japan has been obsessed in the past on the economy in the 1950s, 1960s large-scale return to South Korea, after the rise of some of South Korea Japanese withdrawal came, suffered some setbacks on the economy, but it would also like to use US-South Korea military alliance into Japan, so this is Japan wants to promote the US-South Korea military alliance, a very significant step.

In addition, now South Korea are discussing, for example, the issue of overseas interception, by blocking the weapons of mass destruction abroad, and this plan is in Japan to … …